1955
DOI: 10.1042/bj0590029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on sulphatases. 9. The arylsulphatases of mammalian livers

Abstract: Kinetic data for the hydrolysis of potassium pacetylphenyl sulphate by fresh rat liver suspensions suggested that the arylsulphatase activity so observed could be attributed to a single enzyme (Dodgson, Spencer & Thomas, 1953) which was later found to be localized mainly in the microsomes of the liver cell (Dodgson, Spencer & Thomas, 1954a). Preliminary attempts to purify the microsome enzyme (unpublished data) were handicapped by its insolubility in various buffers and salt solutions of widely differing pH ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
1
1

Year Published

1957
1957
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
60
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing literature shows that the relative distribution of the arylsulphatases A, B and C was studied with whole homogenates or with acetonedried preparations of animal tissues (Robinson, Smith & Williams, 1951;Dodgson et al 1955;Dodgson, Spencer & Wynn, 1956;Pulkinen, 1961). A reinvestigation of their distribution in rat tissues, the mitochondrial fraction being used for the sulphatases A and B and the microsomal fraction for sulphatase C, instead of the whole homogenates, was therefore undertaken ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing literature shows that the relative distribution of the arylsulphatases A, B and C was studied with whole homogenates or with acetonedried preparations of animal tissues (Robinson, Smith & Williams, 1951;Dodgson et al 1955;Dodgson, Spencer & Wynn, 1956;Pulkinen, 1961). A reinvestigation of their distribution in rat tissues, the mitochondrial fraction being used for the sulphatases A and B and the microsomal fraction for sulphatase C, instead of the whole homogenates, was therefore undertaken ( Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three arylsulphatases (A, B and C) have been shown (Dodgson, Spencer & Thomas, 1955) to exist in animal tissues, A and B being of mitochondrial origin, whereas C is a microsomal enzyme. The mitochondrial fractions isolated from 10% homogenates of tissues in 0 25M-sucrose, prepared according to Schneider & Hogeboom (1950) Proteins were estimated by the biuret method (Gornall, Bardawill & David, 1949).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cytoplasmic localization of these enzymes in human tracheobronchial epithelial cells is in accord with the results obtained for the same enzymes in rat-liver cells by the technique of differential centrifuging of cell homogenates. Although a good correlation between RNA content of the cells and enzymes which are localized in the endoplasmic reticulum might have been expected, a similar high degree of correlation was seen with acid phosphatase and arylsulphatases A plus B, which are found in the lysozymes (Viala & Gianetto, 1955;Dodgson, Spencer & Thomas, 1954), and f,-glucuronidase, which is of mixed mitochondrialysozyme localization (de Duve, Pressman, Gianetto, Wattiaux & Appelmans, 1955). The correla--tion of RNA content with the activities of these various enzymes may indicate some direct relationship, or, both the RNA content and the enzyme activities may simply be reflexions of the variation in cytoplasmic size of the cell (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is impossible to provide data for the effects of anions on the latter enzyme because of its sensitivity to cations but it is clear from previous work that sulphate, chloride and phosphate ions have little effect on the type I arylsulphatases of the eutheria (Dodgson, Spencer and Thomas, 1955;Roy, 1956b). It is obvious that although the three enzymes have rather similar Km values for nitrophenyl sulphate they differ in other respects, particularly in the lower values of their pH optima and their sensitivity to sulphate and phosphate ions, the effect of the latter on the opossum enzyme being particularly striking.…”
Section: Sulphatasesmentioning
confidence: 99%