1962
DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(62)90089-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on histamine in human urine using a fluorometric method of assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
13
1
2

Year Published

1965
1965
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
13
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also true that histamine methyltransferase preparations are relatively crude, but there is no evidence that enzymatic methods overestimate histamine compared with fluorimetric methods, and the reference ranges in normal plasma, whole blood, and urine are not significantly different. In the present study the mean values in plasma, urine, and whole blood were 5 nmol/l, 230 nmol/24h, and 560 nmol/l respectively (Table 4), compared with 5 nrnol/l, 400 nmol/24h, and 490 nrnol/l respectively for fluorimetric methods (Oates et al, 1962;Graham et al, 1968;Lorenz et al, 1972).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…It is also true that histamine methyltransferase preparations are relatively crude, but there is no evidence that enzymatic methods overestimate histamine compared with fluorimetric methods, and the reference ranges in normal plasma, whole blood, and urine are not significantly different. In the present study the mean values in plasma, urine, and whole blood were 5 nmol/l, 230 nmol/24h, and 560 nmol/l respectively (Table 4), compared with 5 nrnol/l, 400 nmol/24h, and 490 nrnol/l respectively for fluorimetric methods (Oates et al, 1962;Graham et al, 1968;Lorenz et al, 1972).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 41%
“…The range of values obtained for the urine histamine concentration was from 0.024 to 0.038 fig per ml (Mean 0.029, SD 0.0052 or 8% of the mean). O ates and co-workers (8) empha sized that histamine was poorly recovered from the resin columns when it was applied in water or 0.9% saline solution. Inorganic salts of the buffer mixture apparently aid in the complete elution of histamine from the columns.…”
Section: Methods Urine Histamine Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S h o r e and co-workers (10) demonstrated that fluorescence intensity was proportional to histamine concentrations between 0.005 and 0.5 /ug per ml when 1% OPT was used. O a tes and co workers (8) advised the use of a 'reverse' blank, a sample carried through the extraction and adduct-forming steps, in which forma tion of the histamine OPT adduct, was prevented by acidification before the addition of OPT. This 'reverse' blank proved to be falsely low in our hands since a reagent blank of 1 N HC1 carried through the procedure gave considerably greater fluorescence.…”
Section: Methods Urine Histamine Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of six normal HC1 and were assayed for histamine by the ion-exchange butanol extraction method of Oates, Marsh and Sjoerdsma. 16 The findings were placed on data flow sheets and correlated with other biochemical and physiological changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%