2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.609.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance for Growth, Yield and Quality Parameters among Orange Flesh Sweet Potato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.] Genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
6
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
8
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The above findings indicated that the characters with the high and moderate heritability and genetic advance can be considered for direct selection for improvement. These results are in agreement with the results of Engida et al, (2006); Shashikanth et al, (2008); Madawal et al, (2015); Demelie and Aragao (2016) and Badu et al, (2017) in sweet potato.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The above findings indicated that the characters with the high and moderate heritability and genetic advance can be considered for direct selection for improvement. These results are in agreement with the results of Engida et al, (2006); Shashikanth et al, (2008); Madawal et al, (2015); Demelie and Aragao (2016) and Badu et al, (2017) in sweet potato.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The present experimental material exhibited a wide range of variation for high values of genotypic and phenotypic coefficient of variations were recorded for traits viz., number of tuber per vine, weight of tuber, tuber yield per vine, ascorbic acid and total sugar. The findings of these characters were supported by number of root tuber per vine (Badu et al, 2017) in sweet potato, weight of corm (Yadav et al, 2007) in colocasia, tuber yield per plant (Ramachandra and Srinivasa, 2017) in potato. The present research work reveal that phenotypic coefficient of variation is higher than genotypic coefficient of variation for all the characters indicating influence of environment.…”
Section: Variability Parametersmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Yield component and yield data were transformed with square root (SQRT data + 0.5) before the analyses of variance. The estimation of the genetic parameters included: (a) genotypic coefficient of variation (CVg) and phenotypic coefficient of variation (CVp), (b) heritability (h 2 ) that was categorized as low when h 2 was <20%, moderate when h 2 was 20-50% and high when h 2 was >50% (Singh & Chaudhary, 1977), (c) genetic advance (GA) and the percentage of genetic advance based on average (GAM), as used by Agrawal & Kumar (2017) and Badu, Ashok, Kiran Patro, & Sasikala (2017) at k= selection diferential 5%=2.06, that was categoried as low (<10%), moderate (10-20%) and high (>20%), and (d) genotypic correlation coefficient (r g(xy) ) and phenotypic correlation coefficients (r p(xy) ) with t test for the significance of the correlation test (Singh & Chaudhary, 1977…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%