2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2918221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Different CNN Algorithms for Face Skin Disease Classification Based on Clinical Images

Abstract: Skin problems not only injure physical health but also induce psychological problems, especially for patients whose faces have been damaged or even disfigured. Using smart devices, most of the people are able to obtain convenient clinical images of their face skin condition. On the other hand, the convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved near or even better performance than human beings in the imaging field. Therefore, this paper studied different CNN algorithms for face skin disease classification b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several studies in the literature that explore machine learning-based approaches to the Lupus diagnosis [29], [30], but few studies are related to Malar Rash detection [4], [5] on images.…”
Section: Lupus Automatic Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are several studies in the literature that explore machine learning-based approaches to the Lupus diagnosis [29], [30], but few studies are related to Malar Rash detection [4], [5] on images.…”
Section: Lupus Automatic Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few studies describe computational methods for automatic detection of facial skin lesions that are symptoms of Lupus. [4], [5]. In [4], unsupervised learning was used to detect BMR in images generated artificially by Generative Adversarial Networks (GANS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To achieve a comprehensive analysis, we employ the following metrics widely used in statistics [67], [68]: 1) precision (PR), defined as TP TP+FP , where TP (true positive) means the correctly predicted positive value and FP (false positive) means the wrongly predicted positive value, 2) recall (RE), defined as TP TP+FN , where FN (false negative) means the wrongly predicted negative value, 3) F1-score (F1), defined as 2 * PR * RE PR+RE , is a metric that combines the PR and RE, 4) false positive rate (FPR), defined as FP FP+TN , where TN (true negative) means the correctly predicted negative value. FIGURE 13 shows the statistical results of the four metrics, describes the performance of human activity and location recognition in our experiments.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation a Wirim Performancementioning
confidence: 99%