1936
DOI: 10.2307/3271900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Dientamoeba fragilis (Protozoa). I. Observations with Special Reference to Nuclear Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1944
1944
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cyst forms of D. fragilis were also described from Argentina in 1928 (23). Another study conducted in 1936 on the morphological observations of the parasite from 70 infected patients reported the absence of cysts (21). While no true cyst forms were described in this study, the author did describe what he thought was a precystic or pseudocyst stage of Dientamoeba.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cyst forms of D. fragilis were also described from Argentina in 1928 (23). Another study conducted in 1936 on the morphological observations of the parasite from 70 infected patients reported the absence of cysts (21). While no true cyst forms were described in this study, the author did describe what he thought was a precystic or pseudocyst stage of Dientamoeba.…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Putative precystic or pseudocyst forms (as per the studies by Wenrich [21], Kofoid [20], and Kudo [22]) were found in a total of 163 of the 500 slides, giving a prevalence of 32.6% per patient sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Precysts have recently been described by Stark et al (10); however, previous publications have described these stages in the past (2,11,12). These stages range from 3.5 to 5 m in diameter, have one or two nuclei, and contain finely granular and uniform cytoplasm (12).…”
Section: Life Cycle and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While D. fragilis was first thought to be an ameba, after many years of study using light microscopy, the organism was placed into a new family with Histomonas in 1953, the Dientamoebidae (4,12,17). With the introduction of electron microscopy studies, confirmation was obtained that D. fragilis was closely related to flagellates (18).…”
Section: Life Cycle and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%