Viscous Drag Reduction 1969
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-5579-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of Viscous Drag Reduction with Polymers Including Turbulence Measurements and Roughness Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the tube diameter is 0*63cm, it is impossible t o measure the initial mean velocity profile in great detail. However, past measurements in pipe flows (Spangler 1969) indicate that the chief effect of the polymer upon the mean velocity is the thickening of the viscous sublayer and that the most significant effect upon the turbulence intensity occurs very near the wall. These differences apparently have an effect upon the early development of the jet, since no polymer effect was observed when the initial velocity profiles were uniform.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the tube diameter is 0*63cm, it is impossible t o measure the initial mean velocity profile in great detail. However, past measurements in pipe flows (Spangler 1969) indicate that the chief effect of the polymer upon the mean velocity is the thickening of the viscous sublayer and that the most significant effect upon the turbulence intensity occurs very near the wall. These differences apparently have an effect upon the early development of the jet, since no polymer effect was observed when the initial velocity profiles were uniform.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wells and Spangler (1967) injected a polymer solution into a turbulent water flow at both the wall and the axis of a pipe; in the former case, the wall shear stress was reduced almost directly downstream of the injection point, whereas in the latter case the drag reduction was observed relatively much further downstream, presumably only after the macromolecules had diffused to the wall region. Mean velocity profiles, shown.in Figure 9, indicate that, at low drag reduction, the region affected is closer to the wall than y+ N 50, whereas rough pipe experiments ( McNally, 1968;Spangler, 1969;Virk, 1971) show that onset is unaffected by the presence (hydraulically smooth flow) or absence (fully rough flow) of a viscous sublayer, which suggests that the region of interest is further from the wall than y+ -N 5; together, these implicate 5 < y + < 50 as the region affected by the macromolecules. Turbulence measurements (Figure l l a ) also suggest that the region affected is roughly 10 < y+ < 100.…”
Section: Physical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It was found that the intensity level of the turbulence near the wall increased with injection, and the spectrum showed more energy at low wave-numbers and less a t high wave-numbers compared to that in water. Spangler (1969) obtained measurements similar to those of Virk et al (1967) in a pipe, but with a different polymer (an ionic copolymer of polyacrylamide and polyacrylic acid), and used an impact tube from which instantaneous velocity measurements were inferred. The intensity level at the centre-line of the pipe was increased up to three times that in water, the effect decreasing with increasing mean velocity.…”
Section: A Friehe and W H Schwarxmentioning
confidence: 99%