2013
DOI: 10.1261/rna.039792.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of translational misreading in vivo show that the ribosome very efficiently discriminates against most potential errors

Abstract: Protein synthesis must rapidly and repeatedly discriminate between a single correct and many incorrect aminoacyl-tRNAs. We have attempted to measure the frequencies of all possible missense errors by tRNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
126
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
14
126
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of two distinct proofreading steps may appear surprising, because the accuracy of initial codon selection by ternary complex normally is remarkably high (22,31). Therefore, we suggest that two-step proofreading has evolved to neutralize the deleterious effects of a small number of distinct error hot spots for initial codon selection (31) as observed in vitro (19) and in vivo (18). For instance, initial codon selection values near 100 were seen for Glu-tRNA Glu UUC reading GGA and His-tRNA His GUG reading CGC (31).…”
Section: Why Did Mother Nature Evolve Two Proofreading Steps In Geneticmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of two distinct proofreading steps may appear surprising, because the accuracy of initial codon selection by ternary complex normally is remarkably high (22,31). Therefore, we suggest that two-step proofreading has evolved to neutralize the deleterious effects of a small number of distinct error hot spots for initial codon selection (31) as observed in vitro (19) and in vivo (18). For instance, initial codon selection values near 100 were seen for Glu-tRNA Glu UUC reading GGA and His-tRNA His GUG reading CGC (31).…”
Section: Why Did Mother Nature Evolve Two Proofreading Steps In Geneticmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We use the present results to discuss the molecular basis for proofreading of aminoacyl-tRNAs, which, until now, has remained obscure (17). We suggest that multistep proofreading in genetic code translation has evolved to neutralize potential error hot spots originating in error-prone initial selection of aa-tRNA in ternary complex with EF-Tu and GTP (18,19). Recent cryo-EM data of ribosomes from live human cells show two states of ribosome-bound preaccommodated aa-tRNA, one with aa-tRNA in complex with the EF-Tu homolog eEF1α in the GDP form, the other with only aa-tRNA after release of eEF1α·GDP (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The relative levels of tRNAs and their activities set the balance of translation efficiency, fidelity, pausing, and polypeptide folding (Drummond et al 2005;Reynolds et al 2010;Spencer et al 2012;Manickam et al 2014;Arimbasseri1 et al 2015). Many nucleotides in tRNAs are post-transcriptionally modified and many affect tRNA stability or activity (Phizicky and Hopper 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of decoding is quite high, with measured error rates in bacterial cells on the order of 10 −3 -10 −5 , depending on the nature of the mismatch (Kramer and Farabaugh 2007;Manickam et al 2014). This level of accuracy relies in part on a kinetic proofreading mechanism (Hopfield 1974;Ninio 1975;Ruusala et al 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%