1983
DOI: 10.1002/ps.2780140613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of plant cuticle and spray droplet interactions: A fresh approach

Abstract: The effects of cuticular properties on the impaction and redistribution of aqueous and oil solutions, emulsions and wettable powders were studied using a microapplicator, which dispensed monosize droplets (50‐400 μm), and a range of techniques including scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray analysis and microautoradiography. Lateral and transcuticular movement of active ingredients was monitored by stripping the outermost wax layers and adhering deposits with cellulose acetate films applied as a spray from an ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cellulose acetate was dissolved in acetone (10% w/v) and used to strip wax from the plant surface (Baker et al, 1983). This viscous solution was painted onto the whole seedling (stem and all exposed leaf surfaces).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cellulose acetate was dissolved in acetone (10% w/v) and used to strip wax from the plant surface (Baker et al, 1983). This viscous solution was painted onto the whole seedling (stem and all exposed leaf surfaces).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adaxial crystalline wax was removed from second initiated rape leaves at about 20 % of full leaf expansion using a cellulose acetate film (Baker, Hunt & Stevens, 1983). The 'de-waxed' leaves were then treated as in previous experiments with SR of one of four pHs (5-6, 4-2, 3*4, 2-6) and leaf surface area, wax quantity and wax chemical composition were determined.…”
Section: Epicuticular Wax Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible explanation is that, following fipronil treatment, greater deposition and absorption occur at C. indicum L. relative to the other two plants. Significant variations in pesticide deposition and absorption between different plants have been documented by Baker et al [26]. An additional explanation is that the blooming period of C. indicum L. is long, which means that most flowers sampled received direct deposition of fipronil upon treatment.…”
Section: à2mentioning
confidence: 92%