2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of Non-Protective Autophagy Provide Evidence that Recovery from Therapy-Induced Senescence is Independent of Early Autophagy

Abstract: Autophagy and senescence, predominant responses that may dictate cell fate after chemotherapy or radiation, often occur in tandem. Cells in states of senescence and/or autophagy are frequently growth arrested. We have previously reported that tumor cells induced into senescence by therapy can re-emerge from the growth-arrested state, a phenomenon termed proliferative recovery. The current work shows that, while tumor cells collaterally induced into senescence and autophagy by etoposide, doxorubicin, or radiati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, here, we focused on effect of autophagy inhibition on escaping of cancer cells from senescence in hypoxia. In a recent study by Saleh and coworkers, neither shRNAs against ATG5 nor BAF A1/HCQ treatment prior to the subsequent exposure to chemotherapeutics or radiation affected ability of cancer cells to induce senescence or recover from it (91). In line, here, we showed that siRNAs against: ATG5, ATG7, or Beclin1 introduced to normoxic or hypoxic lung cancer cells prior to CIS treatment, did not changed their ability to induce senescence or senescence escaping.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Therefore, here, we focused on effect of autophagy inhibition on escaping of cancer cells from senescence in hypoxia. In a recent study by Saleh and coworkers, neither shRNAs against ATG5 nor BAF A1/HCQ treatment prior to the subsequent exposure to chemotherapeutics or radiation affected ability of cancer cells to induce senescence or recover from it (91). In line, here, we showed that siRNAs against: ATG5, ATG7, or Beclin1 introduced to normoxic or hypoxic lung cancer cells prior to CIS treatment, did not changed their ability to induce senescence or senescence escaping.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Recently published studies from our laboratory utilizing multiple cytotoxic therapies and multiple cell lines demonstrated senescence induction and proliferative recovery independent of autophagy when the autophagy is ''nonprotective'' in function (92). Furthermore, we observed that autophagy inhibition did not alter the extent of senescence induction or recovery in HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cells exposed to 4 Gy.…”
Section: Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin (Mtor)mentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Conventionally, most preclinical, and clinical studies designed to evaluate the effect of autophagy inhibition involve the addition of the pharmacological autophagy inhibitors concurrently or as a pre-treatment to therapy ( 41 , 43 , 44 ). Preliminary experiments (not shown) suggested the possibility that a more delayed approach to autophagy inhibition might prove to be a more effective sensitization strategy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with the lack of sensitization, pharmacological autophagy inhibition did not significantly promote apoptotic cell death by the combination of the antiestrogen and CDK 4/6 inhibitor (Figure 3G). Conventionally, most preclinical, and clinical studies designed to evaluate the effect of autophagy inhibition involve the addition of the pharmacological autophagy inhibitors concurrently or as a pre-treatment to therapy (41,43,44). Preliminary experiments (not shown) suggested the possibility that a more delayed approach to autophagy inhibition might prove to be a more effective sensitization strategy.…”
Section: Efforts To Sensitize Mcf-7 Breast Tumor Cells Via Autophagy ...mentioning
confidence: 99%