2005
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112004002514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of interactions of a propagating shock wave with decaying grid turbulence: velocity and vorticity fields

Abstract: The unsteady interaction of a moving shock wave with nearly homogeneous and isotropic decaying compressible turbulence has been studied experimentally in a large-scale shock tube facility. Rectangular grids of various mesh sizes were used to generate turbulence with Reynolds numbers based on Taylor's microscale ranging from 260 to 1300. The interaction has been investigated by measuring the three-dimensional velocity and vorticity vectors, the full velocity gradient and rate-of-strain tensors with instrumentat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They found close agreement with Ribner's linear theory for the amplification of velocity fluctuations, and some discrepancy with earlier experiments for the turbulent energy amplification present at low wavenumbers. In an experiment by Agui, Briassulis & Andreopoulos (2005), an incident shock generated an induced flow behind it that passed later through a grid to obtain a nearly homogeneous and isotropic flow field, which was then processed by the reflected shock. Intense vorticity structures were suggested as the cause of high-amplitude events of time signals of enstrophy, dissipation rate and dilatational stretching; the dissipation seemed to have a more dominant effect on the flow motions than on the enstrophy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found close agreement with Ribner's linear theory for the amplification of velocity fluctuations, and some discrepancy with earlier experiments for the turbulent energy amplification present at low wavenumbers. In an experiment by Agui, Briassulis & Andreopoulos (2005), an incident shock generated an induced flow behind it that passed later through a grid to obtain a nearly homogeneous and isotropic flow field, which was then processed by the reflected shock. Intense vorticity structures were suggested as the cause of high-amplitude events of time signals of enstrophy, dissipation rate and dilatational stretching; the dissipation seemed to have a more dominant effect on the flow motions than on the enstrophy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is known as the Linear Interaction Approximation (LIA) [1][2][3]. However, due to the high cost of simulations for the parameter space close to the LIA limit (and practical applications) and difficulties with accurate experimental measurements close to the shock, previous studies have shown only limited agreement with LIA [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Recently, Ryu and Livescu [11], using high resolution fully resolved Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) extensively covering the parameter range, have shown that the DNS results converge to the LIA solutions as the ratio δ/η, where δ is the shock width and η is the Kolmogorov microscale of the incoming turbulence, becomes small.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such interactions can have a strong impact on the flow evolution, increasing turbulent mixing, but also increasing losses and surface drag and/or heat transfer depending upon the strength of the shock. Many studies of shock / turbulence interactions have been conducted, both numerically and experimentally (see Andreopoulos et al [2000] for a review), and physical insights have been gained from the studies of simple test cases, such as the interaction of shocks with isotropic and/or homogeneous turbulence, studied experimentally (e.g., Jacquin et al [1993], Honkan and Andreopoulos [1992], Barre et al [1996], Agui et al [2005]) and numerically using high-order shock capturing methods (e.g., Lee et al [1993], Hannappel and Friedrich [1995], Lee et al [1997], Mahesh et al [1997], Jamme et al [2002Jamme et al [ , 2005) and, more recently, using a shock-fitting method (Sesterhenn et al [2005]). …”
Section: Shock / Turbulence Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%