2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005ja011429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of ELF propagation in the spherical shell cavity using a field decomposition method based on asymmetry of Schumann resonance curves

Abstract: [1] Asymmetric resonance curves are observed in various resonance systems occurring in nature. The reason for such a shape of the resonance curves is an interaction of the standing waves field in the resonator with the field of traveling waves which transmit energy from sources to the resonator. This behavior can be observed in strongly damped electromagnetic resonators. The ELF wave propagation inside the Earth-ionosphere cavity is a good example of the simultaneous occurrence of resonance and transmission ph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this approach the measured field fluctuations have to be decomposed into the resonance field and the traveling wavefield. In the frequency range 1 to 48 Hz we analyzed the observed ELF spectrum, and we fit to the observational data the function with asymmetric resonance maxima [ Kułak et al , ]: W(f,θ)=s+zfm+k=1Npk(θ)[1+ek(θ)(ffk)](ffk)2+(gk2)2,where W ( f , θ ) is the wave power spectrum (T 2 /Hz), s represents the white noise term (T 2 /Hz), z / f m is the color noise term (T 2 /Hz), which describes all internal and external (man‐made) noises and parameter z has physical units of Hz m − 1 T 2 , p k ( θ ) is the power parameter of k th peak from the observed N = 7 resonance peaks and its physical units are T 2 Hz, e k is the introduced asymmetry parameter (Hz −1 ), f k is the resonant frequency (Hz), and g k is the peak width (Hz). The example of the decomposition function fit to the observational ELF data is shown in Figure (left).…”
Section: Application Of the Sr Decomposition To The Calculation Of Somentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this approach the measured field fluctuations have to be decomposed into the resonance field and the traveling wavefield. In the frequency range 1 to 48 Hz we analyzed the observed ELF spectrum, and we fit to the observational data the function with asymmetric resonance maxima [ Kułak et al , ]: W(f,θ)=s+zfm+k=1Npk(θ)[1+ek(θ)(ffk)](ffk)2+(gk2)2,where W ( f , θ ) is the wave power spectrum (T 2 /Hz), s represents the white noise term (T 2 /Hz), z / f m is the color noise term (T 2 /Hz), which describes all internal and external (man‐made) noises and parameter z has physical units of Hz m − 1 T 2 , p k ( θ ) is the power parameter of k th peak from the observed N = 7 resonance peaks and its physical units are T 2 Hz, e k is the introduced asymmetry parameter (Hz −1 ), f k is the resonant frequency (Hz), and g k is the peak width (Hz). The example of the decomposition function fit to the observational ELF data is shown in Figure (left).…”
Section: Application Of the Sr Decomposition To The Calculation Of Somentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such problem also appears in helioseismic resonance activity as described by Gabriel et al []. Having in mind this, we decompose the observational SR power spectra into the symmetric part (a fundamental resonance frequency of the cavity, which does not depend on the distance from thunderstorm centers) and the asymmetric part (due to traveling waves, a component varying in time with changing source distances), as discussed in detail by Kułak et al []. The measured SR spectrum is approximated by the function: W(f)=s+zfm+k=17pk[1+ek(ffk)](ffk)2+(gk/2)2where W ( f ) is the signal power spectrum, s is the white noise component, z / f m is the color noise term, p k is the power parameter of the k th resonance peak, e k is the peak asymmetry parameter, f k is the resonant frequency, and g k is the resonant mode half‐width parameter.…”
Section: Schumann Resonance Measurement During the Sidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 10 minute interval was used in the first successful experiment [7,8]. While SR observations have been ongoing for many years in Hungary [59], USA [26], Japan [60], and Israel [54], recently new observatories have been opened in Poland [61], India [62], China [63,64], Greece [65] and Spain [66].…”
Section: Sr Background Observations Of Global Lightning Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%