1949
DOI: 10.1071/bi9490042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of Comparative Fleece Growth in Sheep I. The Quantitative Nature of Inherent Differences in Wool-Growth Rate

Abstract: Since wool-growth rate is strongly influenced by the plane of nutrition, any measure of inherent wool-producing capacity in the sheep must take this into account, and the relation of these three factors to each other must be known. On general grounds, the relation of wool-growth rate to nutrient intake seems likely to follow the familiar law of diminishing returns which introduces the concept that for each sheep there may be an asymptotic value of wool-growth rate characteristic of the individual. From this an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

1959
1959
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas other workers have postulated from studies under more specifically controlled conditions the possible effects of temperature (Ferguson et al 1949), day-length (Hart, 1955) and light rhythm (Rougeot, 1957;Wildman, 1957) it is not possible from the purely observational data in our case to hazard any definite conclusions on the relative significance of the environmental components recorded. This problem is especially notable in the Wiltshire data, where the coincidence of curves may indicate either a direct causal connexion, or merely a similarity between the environmental fluctuations and an innate or systemically controlled pelage cycle overt in the Wiltshire but occult in the Merino.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas other workers have postulated from studies under more specifically controlled conditions the possible effects of temperature (Ferguson et al 1949), day-length (Hart, 1955) and light rhythm (Rougeot, 1957;Wildman, 1957) it is not possible from the purely observational data in our case to hazard any definite conclusions on the relative significance of the environmental components recorded. This problem is especially notable in the Wiltshire data, where the coincidence of curves may indicate either a direct causal connexion, or merely a similarity between the environmental fluctuations and an innate or systemically controlled pelage cycle overt in the Wiltshire but occult in the Merino.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…1, the relative constancy of fibre diameter in the Merinos is well contrasted with the wide fluctuations of this character in the Wiltshires. What variation in diameter appears in the Merinos lies within the acceptable limits for physiologically unstressed adult ewes of this breed (Ferguson, Carter & Hardy, 1949). The general level of diameter maintained is close to the mean maximum for the fine-wool genotype within the breed (Daly & Carter, 1955).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The relation between food intake and either body or wool growth is known to be one of diminishing returns (Marston 1948;Ferguson et al 1949) with different sheep varying in growth potential. It was, however, not possible to detect curvilinearity in growth reponse in the small groups in this trial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutritional studies of wool production have been confined largely to the effects of different levels of nutrition on pen-fed sheep (Weber, 1931;Marston, 1948;Ferguson, Carter & Hardy, 1949;Daly & Carter, 1955), and there have been few investigations on the effects of variation in feed quality under grazing conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%