1948
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1948.tb05098.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies in the Morphogenesis of Leaves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0
1

Year Published

1950
1950
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Flowering time can diversify rapidly in annuals such as C. hirsuta, so this coordinated regulation of leaf shape and flowering time by ChFLC may provide a mechanism for trait integration that anchors vegetative growth to reproduction to optimize resource allocation to seeds (48). Similar examples were reported as early as 1944 in cotton (54,55), where early flowering genotypes developed leaves with increased complexity, and our work provides a framework to interpret these results from diverse taxa. However, heteroblasty can be uncoupled from reproduction in other examples (56), and early flowering can be associated with decreased, rather that increased, leaf complexity (57).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Flowering time can diversify rapidly in annuals such as C. hirsuta, so this coordinated regulation of leaf shape and flowering time by ChFLC may provide a mechanism for trait integration that anchors vegetative growth to reproduction to optimize resource allocation to seeds (48). Similar examples were reported as early as 1944 in cotton (54,55), where early flowering genotypes developed leaves with increased complexity, and our work provides a framework to interpret these results from diverse taxa. However, heteroblasty can be uncoupled from reproduction in other examples (56), and early flowering can be associated with decreased, rather that increased, leaf complexity (57).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Therefore, vertical patterns in leaf morphology result from vertical changes in environmental conditions generated by the growing plant. Conversely, some heteroblastic species show consistent heteroblastic changes regardless of the conditions plants experience during developement (e.g., Hedera helix; see Ashby 1948;Wells & Pigliucci 2000). Results reported here are similar to a larger number of studies illustrating that heteroblasty results from a combination of programmed developmental changes and phenotypic plasticity (Jones 1995;Watson et al 1995;Winn 1996a,b;James & Bell 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Heteroblasty could follow a rigid developmental programme, with consistent changes in leaf morphology occurring regardless of the conditions plants experience during development (see Ashby 1948;Wells & Pigliucci 2000). Conversely, heteroblasty could be generated entirely by plastic responses of individual leaves to environmental conditions (Sultan 2000;Zwieniecki et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies in this series (Ashby, 1948 a, b;Ashby, Wangermann & Winter, 1949;Ashby& Wangermann, 19500,6;Wangermann & Ashby, 1950) have been concerned with some of the morphological differences between old and young leaves on the same plant. Among other results, these studies have established that leaf morphology is influenced not only by the environment, but that also, when the influence of the environment is eliminated, there still remain morphological differences between successive leaves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%