The purposes of the study were to uncover the general structure of the concept used to perceive sQcialgroups acting as simulated nations, to de-'ter.mine whether the complexity and content of this perceptual concept would shift under varying situational stresses and to discover whether differences in the complexity of this specific concept could be traced to a measure of gener~izedcognitive complexity.A model was presented in which complexity in~concept was defined in terms of three qualities: (1) amount o~differentiation, (2)-degree of representative integration and (3) preponde:tance of interna,l dynamic properties of stimuli over more primitive external characteristics.The theory adva.nced was that complexity would relate to stress in a curvilinear fashion. Moderate stress should induce greater complexity in social perception than either too mild or too in1;;ense stress.. In addition it was. expected that at :most stresS levels dif:ferences 1ncomplexity can be related to differences in the characteristic levels of cognitive complexity in perceivers.In order to examine these points, the complexity of the social group concept as, it i'unct:i.oned in the Internation Simu1.ationwaB studied.. The s:iJnulation a.llowed seven, three-man n,ations to operate in a complex decis ion1J1aking environment for f"our days. In 10 diff"erent runs of the simulation; one half o£ the nations were manned by persons of high generalized c.omplexity, while half were staffed with more generally simple persons.Generalized complexity was measured with the Situational Interpretation Teat.-iiFour runs involved the intense stress of war, four :peace runs were of moderate stress and two peace runs were classed as mild stress.The content and structure of the social group concepts employed in the INS were measured by DlultidiIllensiona.l scaling. Via multidimensional methods the social group concepts of the average person in each run were computed. In addition the multidimensional concepts of unique, non-average persons were calculated in one war and one peace run. On the whole the results confir.med the model in highly provocative and suggestive ways. Multidimensional representations of both average and unique concepts were highly meaningful and related to events in the simulation. In particular three regular dimensions of social group perception emerged in average concepts: alliance, power, and activity. The significance 'of these d:lJ:nensions for perceptual and semantic theory was noted.The structure of both average and unique concepts varied in a curvilinear '\.lay with stress. Interesting differences in content and structure of concepts were found between mild, moderate, and intense stress conditions. Particularly interesting were the features of concept structures which were flound on the eve of war. Also of interest were the implications of both the complexity and content of con,cepts ;for an understanding of interests and decisions in the INS.