2014
DOI: 10.1109/mpe.2014.2317960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies in Empowerment: Approaches to Rural Electrification Worldwide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Benefit-cost-ratio in (1) incorporates the following variables: the present value for electricity sales denoted as , the amount of electricity in kWh sold in a year denoted as , the value of electricity in kWh denoted as , the discounted value of investment stream denoted as , the discounted value of operations and maintenance costs each year denoted as _ , the present value of losses denoted as , the long range marginal cost for distribution denoted as , the kWh losses in a year denoted as . However, this is easy to plan for but harder to implement because other factors challenge cheap SWER technology implementation in rural areas because of low consumption (Karki, 2004;Maunsell Limited, 2006;Rudnick et al, 2014). Despite these challenges, Cuba has achieved 28.8% for its SWER implementation compared if they used the conventional TPTW (Monteagudo, 2014).…”
Section: A High Benefit-cost-ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefit-cost-ratio in (1) incorporates the following variables: the present value for electricity sales denoted as , the amount of electricity in kWh sold in a year denoted as , the value of electricity in kWh denoted as , the discounted value of investment stream denoted as , the discounted value of operations and maintenance costs each year denoted as _ , the present value of losses denoted as , the long range marginal cost for distribution denoted as , the kWh losses in a year denoted as . However, this is easy to plan for but harder to implement because other factors challenge cheap SWER technology implementation in rural areas because of low consumption (Karki, 2004;Maunsell Limited, 2006;Rudnick et al, 2014). Despite these challenges, Cuba has achieved 28.8% for its SWER implementation compared if they used the conventional TPTW (Monteagudo, 2014).…”
Section: A High Benefit-cost-ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefit-cost-ratio in (1) incorporates the following variables: the present value for electricity sales denoted as , the amount of electricity in kWh sold in a year denoted as , the value of electricity in kWh denoted as , the discounted value of investment stream denoted as , the discounted value of operations and maintenance costs each year denoted as , the present value of losses denoted as , the long range marginal cost for distribution denoted as , the kWh losses in a year denoted as . However, this is easy to plan for but harder to implement because other factors challenge cheap SWER technology implementation in rural areas because of low consumption (Karki, 2004;Maunsell Limited, 2006;Rudnick et al, 2014). Despite these challenges, Cuba has achieved 28.8% for its SWER implementation compared if they used the conventional TPTW (Monteagudo, 2014).…”
Section: ……… (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A continuación, se analizan publicaciones que se centran en la dimensión institucional; es decir, que evalúan el funcionamiento de los planes y proyectos en cuanto al papel de las instituciones público-privadas promotoras. En este sentido, en los últimos años se ha venido insistiendo que la electrificación rural debe ser promovida por los gobiernos, pero sin que éstos interfieran una vez iniciada, para dar el impulso inicial y que luego el mercado asegure la continuidad de las iniciativas (Rudnick et al, 2014).…”
Section: Dimensión Institucionalunclassified