2000
DOI: 10.2307/2666162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies in Annonaceae XXXVI. The Duguetia Alliance: Where the Ways Part

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent morphological cladistic analyses ( Doyle and Le Thomas 1994 ;Johnson and Murray 1995 ;Doyle and Le Thomas 1996 ;Chatrou et al 2000 ) as well as molecular phylogenetic studies ( Doyle et al 2000 ;Richardson et al 2004 ;Pirie et al 2006 ;Couvreur et al 2008 ) have elucidated many intergeneric and higherlevel relationships. The grouping of Greenwayodendron with Piptostigma in an early diverging position within the SBC was already inferred in previous molecular phylogenetic analyses ( Richardson et al 2004 ;Pirie et al 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, recent morphological cladistic analyses ( Doyle and Le Thomas 1994 ;Johnson and Murray 1995 ;Doyle and Le Thomas 1996 ;Chatrou et al 2000 ) as well as molecular phylogenetic studies ( Doyle et al 2000 ;Richardson et al 2004 ;Pirie et al 2006 ;Couvreur et al 2008 ) have elucidated many intergeneric and higherlevel relationships. The grouping of Greenwayodendron with Piptostigma in an early diverging position within the SBC was already inferred in previous molecular phylogenetic analyses ( Richardson et al 2004 ;Pirie et al 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Convincingly accepting or ruling out key innovations as an explanation would require more formal reconstructions of character evolution and the assessment of many more characters, which is beyond the scope of this article. The data used related to leaf architecture (Johnson, 2003), leaf anatomy (Van Setten & Koek‐Noorman, 1986), flower and fruit morphology (Koek‐Noorman, Setten & Zuilen, 1997), chromosome numbers (Morawetz & Waha, 1985), anther development (Tsou & Johnson, 2003), pollination characteristics (Gottsberger, 1999), evolution of fragile exines (Waha, 1987), pollen characters (Doyle & Le Thomas, 1997), different trichome types, lianas and styles (Chatrou, Koek‐Noorman & Maas, 2000), bilobed arils and different shapes of the floral receptacle (Johnson & Murray, 1995), oil composition (Maia et al ., 2005a, b) and orbicules (Huysmans et al ., 2010). A more elaborate discussion on morphological evolution in Annonaceae is given in Chatrou et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on taxa outside Myristicaceae from Metcalfe (1987), plus Metcalfe & Chalk (1950) for Piperineae and Kubitzki (1993) for Degeneria . Some Annonaceae have stellate and peltate hairs, but phylogenetic analyses indicate that these are derived in the family (Doyle & Le Thomas, 1996; Chatrou, Koek‐Norman & Maas, 2000; Doyle et al ., 2000). Data on Myristicaceae from Koster & Baas (1981), Bernardi & Spichiger (1980), and our observations.…”
Section: Appendix a Morphological Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DE‐75. In Annonaceae, presence of a style is a derived condition (Doyle & Le Thomas, 1996; Chatrou et al ., 2000). Most Myristicaceae have a sessile stigma, but species of Mauloutchia (including M. coriacea ) have more or less elongate stigmatic lobes and are therefore scored as (?…”
Section: Appendix a Morphological Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%