1974
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1974.36.3.333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies during open-heart surgery on the special characteristics of rectal temperature.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although older studies suggest that rectal temperature may correlate poorly with core temperature [3][4][5], this at least appears to be a better indicator of core temperature than axillary or oral temperatures [2,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Although older studies suggest that rectal temperature may correlate poorly with core temperature [3][4][5], this at least appears to be a better indicator of core temperature than axillary or oral temperatures [2,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Historically, the rectal route was preferred to measure a patient's core temperature. However, rectal temperature significantly lags behind other core sites such as the oesophageal site, especially during acute temperature alterations [2,3]. This method also poses the potential risk of rectal perforation and could be uncomfortable for the patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In laboratory tests, either rectal or esophageal temperature of the volunteers is monitored to ensire that internal body temperature (core temperature) does not exceed safe clinical limits. Each of these core temperature indices is reproducible and not biased by environmental temperature (2,8,14); however, the slow response time of rectal temperature is well known (7,8,11,15,16). Esophageal temperature measurements are not used in the field, but are routinely used in laboratory tests which are concerned with the study of thermoregulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%