2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3080633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studentss Success Prediction Based on Bayes Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our fuzzy evaluation model included 3 factors {SCP, AEP, SAR} and 3 criteria levels {v1, v2, v3} for each factor. Based on Equations (6) - (8), membership functions of factor SCP, AEP, and SAR at 3 criteria levels were established, with factor SCP at level 1 as an example shown in Equation (13). Then, by substituting the student's factor data into the membership functions of each factor at each level, the fuzzy matrix D was obtained for this student, which is shown in Equation (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our fuzzy evaluation model included 3 factors {SCP, AEP, SAR} and 3 criteria levels {v1, v2, v3} for each factor. Based on Equations (6) - (8), membership functions of factor SCP, AEP, and SAR at 3 criteria levels were established, with factor SCP at level 1 as an example shown in Equation (13). Then, by substituting the student's factor data into the membership functions of each factor at each level, the fuzzy matrix D was obtained for this student, which is shown in Equation (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kris et al [7] used the naive bayes algorithm to predict academic performance based on intelligence, motivation and study habits factors. Madhavi et al [26], Mollica et al [21], and Khalaf et al [13] used the bayes classification to determine student study performance. Martin et al [18] and Kevin et al [14] used a classification system to identify poor performers during current course studying.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following criteria were used to evaluate DT performance and determine if the model is suitable for prediction [61,65,68,78]. The true positive (TP) instances represent the correctly predicted cases.…”
Section: Model Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other category is machine learning approaches. For example, decision tree and association rules [13], support vector machine [14], Bayesian algorithm [15], BP artificial neural network [16], genetic algorithm [17], and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [18] were all applied in the prediction of students' learning performance and identification of at-risk students with learning difficulties. From these, it can be noted that research on learning performance prediction methods has shown a trend of algorithmization and automation.…”
Section: The Research On Prediction Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%