2010
DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2010.513956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ use of asynchronous discussions for academic discourse socialization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the findings of showed that discourse socialization is a complex, dynamic process of co-construction and negotiation, supporting other researchers' recently reported qualitative studies (e.g., [23], [28], [29]). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also the findings of showed that discourse socialization is a complex, dynamic process of co-construction and negotiation, supporting other researchers' recently reported qualitative studies (e.g., [23], [28], [29]). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In classroom settings, many studies on CMC during the last decade have focused on the benefits of CMC regarding its function that can change traditional power structures in the classroom and provide learning opportunities for students. However, very few CMC studies in higher education contexts attempted to explore L2 learners' academic discourse socialization through online discussions (for an exception see [23]). …”
Section: Significance Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moore [43] reports that, "for effective interaction, students and faculty benefit from clear expectations about communicating; clear expectations help manage the volume and quality of interaction" (p. 97). Beckett, Amaro-Jimenez, and Beckett [47] similarly argue that non-English speaking students in particular need explicit instructions and guidance in an online environment. It is therefore important to design a cyber-environment that encourages a high level of student communication or interactions that go beyond the simple sharing of ideas [48,49].…”
Section: B Computer-mediated Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, grading discussion responses tends to be more subjective and therefore more difficult to define quality expectations (Beckett, Amaro-Jiménez, and Beckett, 2010). With respect to expectations, students come to online classes with various learning styles and preferences of how they engage with course material (Mupinga, Nora, & Yaw, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%