2000
DOI: 10.1080/10904018.2000.10499032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students' Self-Perceived Listening Competencies in the Basic Speech Communication Course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Shapiro, 2002). For instance, Ford, Wolvin, and Chung (2000) reported data suggesting college students may overestimate their own listening abilities. Another potential limitation inherently present in self-report measures is a social desirability bias, meaning individuals completing the various listening scales in this study, despite reassurances of anonymity, still strove to present themselves as good listeners.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Shapiro, 2002). For instance, Ford, Wolvin, and Chung (2000) reported data suggesting college students may overestimate their own listening abilities. Another potential limitation inherently present in self-report measures is a social desirability bias, meaning individuals completing the various listening scales in this study, despite reassurances of anonymity, still strove to present themselves as good listeners.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, determining the general categories developed by students in their self-evaluations may be important to understand how accurately students perceive their level of competency (Zabava Ford, Wolvin, & Chung, 2000). In this study, students were asked to grade their speeches in self-evaluations; this permits a comparison of a student grade to an instructor's grade.…”
Section: Self-perceptions Of Public Speaking Competencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Listening Competency Scale Revised (LCSR) (Mickelson & Welch, 2013) Listening Competency Scale (LCS) (Ford et al, 2000) [This scale was called FWC in our previous ILA Paper, Fontana et al, 2013. ] Listening Style Profile Revised (LSPR) (Bodie, Worthington, & Gearhart, 2013) …”
Section: Listening Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, if there were multiple versions of a scale, we decided to include all versions that met the other criteria. For example, we included both the original Listening Competency Scale (Ford, Wolvin, & Chung, 2000) and the Revised Listening Competency Scale (Mickelson & Welch, 2012). Although this criterion introduces dependency into the sampling and potentially weights a scale by the number of versions, this approach allowed us to perform an analysis on older scales and newer scales.…”
Section: Scale Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%