1998
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students' reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis.

Abstract: The authors investigated the self-reported relationships among 5th-and 6th-grade students' achievement goals in mathematics, their negative affect about making mistakes, and their self-regulatory beliefs and behaviors. Cluster analysis revealed 4 motivational-affective patterns. Two groups were characterized by positive motivational-affective patterns and 2 suggested more problematic patterns related to different goal patterns, negative affect, and less positive self-regulatory behaviors and beliefs. Path anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
107
2
11

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(104 reference statements)
10
107
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Profiles similar to the three profiles discussed above were also identified in previous cluster analytic studies focusing on the classical mastery-performance dichotomy, which have generally identified a mastery-dominated profile, a performance-dominated profile, an unmotivated profile, and a high mastery/high performance profile (e.g., Daniels et al 2008;Turner, Thorpe, & Meyer, 1998), mainly among samples of North American children and young adults. In addition to the previously discussed Mastery-Socially Oriented profile, the Mastery Oriented profile (males only) also seems to correspond to the mastery-dominant profiles identified in these studies.…”
Section: Gender Differentiation and Similarity In Achievement Goal Prmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Profiles similar to the three profiles discussed above were also identified in previous cluster analytic studies focusing on the classical mastery-performance dichotomy, which have generally identified a mastery-dominated profile, a performance-dominated profile, an unmotivated profile, and a high mastery/high performance profile (e.g., Daniels et al 2008;Turner, Thorpe, & Meyer, 1998), mainly among samples of North American children and young adults. In addition to the previously discussed Mastery-Socially Oriented profile, the Mastery Oriented profile (males only) also seems to correspond to the mastery-dominant profiles identified in these studies.…”
Section: Gender Differentiation and Similarity In Achievement Goal Prmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Students with low self-efficacy beliefs are more vulnerable to experience achievement anxiety, because believing that something in the situation exceeds their competence or threatens their feelings of self-worth leads them to dwell on these worries instead of concentrating on adaptive functioning (Bandura, 1993;Turner et al, 1998).…”
Section: Achievement-related Affects and Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active form of task avoidance, on the other hand, is characterized by a low level of effort and an active attempt to avoid the challenge by engaging in irrelevant activities. Lowered beliefs in personal competence lead the students to expect nothing but failure, and to engage in task-irrelevant behaviors in order to create an excuse for this failure (self-handicapping; Midgley, Arunkumar, & Urdan, 1996;Turner, Thorpe, & Meyer, 1998).…”
Section: Achievement-related Affects and Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated by [15], the relation between attitude and motivation for learning has been actively studied in psychology. [16] found that attitude of students toward learning were correlate to achievement, motivation to learn, and self-regulated learning.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%