Students’ reasoning when tackling electric field and potential in explanation of dc resistive circuits

Abstract

This study examines the causal reasoning that university students use to explain how dc circuits work. We analyze how students use the concepts of electric field and potential difference in their explanatory models of dc circuits, and what kinds of reasoning they use at the macroscopic and microscopic levels in their explanations. This knowledge is essential to help instructors design and implement new teaching approaches that encourage students to articulate the macroscopic and microscopic levels of description. A questionnaire with an emphasis on explanations was used to analyze students' reasoning. In this analysis of students' reasoning in the microscopic and macroscopic modeling processes in a dc circuit, we refer to epistemological studies of scientific explanations. We conclude that the student explanations fall into three main categories of reasoning. The vast majority of students employ an explanatory model based on simple or linear causality and on relational reasoning. Moreover, around a third of students use a relational reasoning that relates two magnitudes current and resistance or conductivity of the material, which is included in a macroscopic explanatory model based on Ohm's law and the conservation of the current. In addition, few students situate the explanations at the microscopic level (charges or electrons) with unidirectional cause-effect reasoning. This study looks at a number of aspects that have been little mentioned in previous research at the university level, about the reasoning types students use when establishing macro-micro relationships and some possible difficulties with complex reasoning.

Implementation and Results of a New Problem Solving Approach in Physics Teaching

“…The results of this research have been presented for the first time in this research in the physics area had been encountered. This research shows the positive effects of the "Extended Problem-Solving Strategy" implementation in the physics course at the university level on the metacognitive awareness, critical thinking, problem solving and logical thinking skills and each of these skills affects the other skills positively (Halpern, 2010;Hollingworth & McLoughlin, 2001;Lawson, 1978Lawson, , 2004Leniz & Guisasola, 2017;Mendez, Sanchez, & Mendez, 2017;Lucangeli, Galderisi, & Cornoldi, 1995;Tiruneh, Verburgh, & Elen, 2017;Leniz, Zuza, & Guisasola, 2017;Trisnowati & Sumardi, 2019).…”

A case of successful learning about magnetism through the use of evidence

“…Here we showed that this success occurred through the thoughtful use of evidence along with additional supports in the form of discussion and disagreements with others. The literature has documented the importance of modeling in physics instruction [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], but less work has documented pathways of how this success occurs and relevant factors. Here we showed the importance of key evidence in contributing to this instance of successful learning.…”

“…However, research in modeling has often focused on difficulties: Students are often more concerned with how a model looks than what a model does [10] and can have challenges with applying models from one context to another [11,12]. Furthermore, some of the PER work related to modeling has documented success through quantitative outcome measures [13][14][15][16], but less work has examined the learning pathways towards success [17].…”

Changes to equipotential diagrams to improve student ranking of electric potential

“…Electric potential is a widely used concept that students have a variety of difficulties with. These issues have been well explored and include issues with electrical potential energy, relating the electric potential to the electric field, and connecting electric potential and current flow [1][2][3]. Other common difficulties involve assigning electric potential for conductors, the choice of the zero point [4], and the importance of charge sign in determining the electric potential [5].…”