2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ Practicum Performance of Industrial Internship Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would improve their attitude to work as they strive to make things work. This result agrees with Ahmad et al (2013) who indicated through the findings of a survey that teaching practice students acquired meaningful work knowledge, demonstrated good working skills with the right attitudes at the workplace. The result was also favourable and suggested that the industrial practicum training briefings, practicum curriculum and guidelines have a positive impact on the students' prior practicum attachment to the industry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This would improve their attitude to work as they strive to make things work. This result agrees with Ahmad et al (2013) who indicated through the findings of a survey that teaching practice students acquired meaningful work knowledge, demonstrated good working skills with the right attitudes at the workplace. The result was also favourable and suggested that the industrial practicum training briefings, practicum curriculum and guidelines have a positive impact on the students' prior practicum attachment to the industry.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The result from the study indicated that teaching practice students acquired meaningful work knowledge, demonstrated good working skills with the right attitudes at the workplace, suggesting that the industrial practicum training briefings, practicum curriculum and guidelines have a positive impact on the students' prior practicum attachment to the industry (Ahmad et al, 2013). Using a correlational method, Olcum and Titrek (2015) determined that student-teacher job satisfaction levels were predicted significantly by administrators' decision-making styles.…”
Section: Principals' Decision-making Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 16 criteria and 13 subcriteria were identifed. Tese criteria were (1) total number of lecturers/supervisors, (2) total number of students (i.e., (2.1) minimum number of students permissible on any project and (2.2) maximum number of students permissible on any project), (3) total number of projects, (4) profle of student in terms of preferences or similarities in student preferences or choices over projects, (5) student discipline [34], (6) suitability of student discipline to project, (7) total number of disciplines, (8) fnal year project prerequisites, (9) lecturers/ supervisors preferences, e.g., (9.1) research interests/areas, (9.2) lecturers' expertise/feld of specialization [35,36], (9.3) professional support [27,37], (10) lecturer and student relationship [37], (11) popularity of project, e.g., (11.1) least popular/preferred and (11.2) most popular/preferred, (12) popularity of lecturer, (13) workload, e.g., (13.1) project and lecturers total capacity, (13.2) availability, (13.3) total project lower quota, (13.4) total lecturer lower quota, (13.5) individual student projects, (13.6) group student projects [34,38], ( 14) students' performance on projects [31], (15) students' gender [27], and ( 16) Other (e.g., university requirements). Te 16 criteria were encapsulated into the developed framework for this study, using process mapping principles to increase our understanding of the theory of student-to-supervisor assignments [39][40][41].…”
Section: Framework For the Student-to-supervisor Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%