Students’ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue

Abstract

Efforts have been devoted to introduce in science curricula direct instruction for evaluating scientific reports on socioscientific issues. In this study, students' opinions on the SSI of mobile telephones effects have been investigated before and after a classroom activity designed to enable students to assess scientific data. Aspects of the nature of science raised by students interpreting available contradictory research evidence and making personal decision on this SSI have also been documented. Results indicated the central role of considerations of scientific evidence in students' decision making. Students tended to over-attribute significance to empirical processes in justifying viewpoints on the SSI of mobile phones and in suggesting how scientific disputes might be resolved.

‘Should We Kill the Grey Squirrels?’ A Study Exploring Students’ Justifications and Decision-Making

“…Zohar & Nemet, 2002), and engagement with science (e.g. Albe, 2008). A problem that is still unexplored in our field is how different students (e.g.…”

Deliberating science in Italian high school. The case of the Scienza Attiva project

“…Such programs involve a genuine renewal of the curricula and teaching practices, offering new content and new study materials. Examples of the most significant programs include the initiatives promoted by the socio-scientific issues research movement that offers a way to explore the nature of science and the relationship between science and society in dealing with contemporary socio-scientific controversies [see, for example, Kolstø, 2000;Albe, 2008].…”

Talking with the Scientists: Promoting Scientific Citizenship at School through Participatory and Deliberative Approach

“…They have entailed a real renegotiation of the culture of science teaching, proposing new content as well as new classroom materials. Among the most significant experiences we remember, for example, the initiatives promoted by the socio-scientific issues movement that offers a way to explore the nature of science and the relationship between science and society dealing with contemporary socio-scientific controversies (Driver et al, 2000;Kolstø, 2001;Sadler et al, 2004;Albe, 2008).…”