2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20257-6_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ Performance Prediction Model Using Meta-classifier Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results verify the effectiveness of its algorithm. From a methodological point of view, many studies belong to the research of hybrid model type (Sandoval et al, 2018;Yu et al, 2018a;Zhou et al, 2018;Akçapınar et al, 2019;Baneres et al, 2019;Hassan et al, 2019;Hung et al, 2019;Polyzou and Karypis, 2019). The underlying logic of this type of research is that the algorithms differ in their optimization search logic and find the most suitable algorithm for course failure prediction by comparison.…”
Section: Methods For Course Failure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experimental results verify the effectiveness of its algorithm. From a methodological point of view, many studies belong to the research of hybrid model type (Sandoval et al, 2018;Yu et al, 2018a;Zhou et al, 2018;Akçapınar et al, 2019;Baneres et al, 2019;Hassan et al, 2019;Hung et al, 2019;Polyzou and Karypis, 2019). The underlying logic of this type of research is that the algorithms differ in their optimization search logic and find the most suitable algorithm for course failure prediction by comparison.…”
Section: Methods For Course Failure Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Background features appear with a high frequency in studies of course failure prediction (Livieris et al, 2016;Hu et al, 2017;Tsiakmaki et al, 2018;Francis and Babu, 2019;Hassan et al, 2019;Hung et al, 2019;Yu et al, 2020). Livieris et al (2016) present a new user-friendly decision support tool for predicting students' performance concerning the final examinations of a school year, and they choose demographic features and historical academic performance as features.…”
Section: Background Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows the variables found that belong to the factor and the authors who used some of these for the development of their models. [28], [35], [45], [47], [49], [50], [55], [57], [59], [65], [70], [72]- [79] Source: Own work.…”
Section: E-learning Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assignments, Campus of study, Class, College/university integration, Course size, Extra paid classes, Extracurricular activities, Rank teacher, School's environment, Students in the course, Subjects, University support [28], [30], [35], [42], [43], [48]- [50], [53]- [56], [58], [59], [64], [68], [81] Source: Own work.…”
Section: Factor Variables Authors Who Consider Variables Of This Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The platforms involved MOOCs as EDx and distance learning platforms from universities e.g. Amrieh et al, (2015), Tang et al, (2015, Mahboob et al, (2017, Hassan et al, (2019). In addition, the scores in various tests were used as well as the demographic data of the students.…”
Section: Attributes Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%