Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ perceptions of teaching technologies, application of technologies, and academic performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
90
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, our study complements other proposals made from different perspectives. By way of example, it is worth mentioning models that determine the importance of digital competences in higher education lecturers (Jeffs & Banister, 2006;Masood, 2010;Naci & Ferhan, 2009;Rong & Ling, 2008), to which it is necessary to add those studies describing the importance of standards related to digital competences in the training of higher education students (Alan & Pitt, 2010;Hong & Jung, 2010;Kadijevich & Haapasalo, 2008;Kaminski, Switzer, & Gloeckner, 2009;Li-Ping & Jill, 2009;Niederhauser, Lindstrom, & Strobel, 2007;Voithofer, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, our study complements other proposals made from different perspectives. By way of example, it is worth mentioning models that determine the importance of digital competences in higher education lecturers (Jeffs & Banister, 2006;Masood, 2010;Naci & Ferhan, 2009;Rong & Ling, 2008), to which it is necessary to add those studies describing the importance of standards related to digital competences in the training of higher education students (Alan & Pitt, 2010;Hong & Jung, 2010;Kadijevich & Haapasalo, 2008;Kaminski, Switzer, & Gloeckner, 2009;Li-Ping & Jill, 2009;Niederhauser, Lindstrom, & Strobel, 2007;Voithofer, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have found that Internet, email, and productivity tools are the most commonly used ICTs in higher education settings (e.g., Conole, Delaat, Dillon, & Darby, 2008;Kirkwood & Price, 2005;Kvavik, Caruso, & Morgan, 2004). Students, for instance, perceive that browsing the web and using social media tools are beneficial as they support their learning and let them explore 535 beyond the limits of a textbook (Tang & Austin, 2009;Kirkwood & Price, 2005). The pedagogical value of integrating blogs into university-level courses is garnering increased interest (Goktas & Demirel, 2012).…”
Section: Integration Of Icts In the Era Of Web 20mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, several researchers have investigated the link between students' perceptions of the frequency and nature of ICTs used in the classroom and its relationship with the perceived quality of learning (e.g., Artino, 2007;Dziuban & Moskal, 2011;Lowerison, Sclater, Schmid, & Abrami, 2006a;Tang & Austin, 2009). In the present study, we extend existing research frameworks surrounding the perceived efficacy of technology use in post-secondary contexts, and using a survey methodology, we attempt to elucidate the myriad factors impacting instructors' and students' perceptions of course effectiveness and technology integration in an age of increased social media technology use.…”
Section: Faculty Of Education Mcgill Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15] Additionally, assessing the technologies that students perceive as beneficial or detrimental to their learning may help highlight potential problem areas. 15 Students' technology preferences may be the next highly important variable in the selection criteria for instructional technologies. Our aim was to assess students' use and perceptions of several specific technologies used in our pharmacy program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%