2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ Perception towards Lecture Capture based on the Technology Acceptance Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such findings do not imply that PEU can be overlooked in the design of CALL platforms. In this regard, Khee et al (2014) suggested that users' familiarity with the system should be the main concern when considering PEU in platform design. Further research in this vein would do well to include learners' familiarity with the system as a factor in the SEM to examine its relationship with the other variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, such findings do not imply that PEU can be overlooked in the design of CALL platforms. In this regard, Khee et al (2014) suggested that users' familiarity with the system should be the main concern when considering PEU in platform design. Further research in this vein would do well to include learners' familiarity with the system as a factor in the SEM to examine its relationship with the other variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same vein, the TAM is also acknowledged as an appropriate tool to assess users' acceptance of e-learning (Park, 2009), which remains an important field of study despite differences across cultures (Venkatesh & Zhang, 2010). As mentioned above, users' PU and PEU are the two cognitive constructs considered vital in their uptake of technology (Khee, Wei, & Jamaluddin, 2014;Mah & Er, 2009;Wu & Wang, 2005) or technology-based learning (Albirini, 2006;Park, 2009). PU reflects the degree to which the user believes a particular technology can assist his/her job performance or learning, whereas PEU reflects the user's beliefs regarding the effort required to use the technology.…”
Section: The Technology Acceptance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduced by Davis *Corresponding Author www.ijacsa.thesai.org (1989), TAM was an evolution of the "Theory of Reasoned Action" [13]. TAM is a blueprint for how it will be adopted and used by technology users [17]. Another opinion said that TAM gave a recommendation when people use new technology for their activity based on usefulness and ease to use, this recommendation will influence their decision, accepting or rejecting it [18].…”
Section: A Technology Acceptance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesela, DYS'den önce sınıftaki sunumlarda sadece konudan önceki sorular oluyordu, videolar oluyordu, görseller oluyordu ve hani, hocayı dinlemek tartışmak zorundaydın, not almak zorundaydın. (Khee, Wei ve Jamaluddin, 2014;Elliott ve Neal, 2016;Evans ve Luke, 2020). Öğrencilerin derslerde tanıtıldıklarında zorlayıcı buldukları materyallerin, bağımsız çalışılmasını ve anlaşılmasını desteklemek ve uluslararası öğrenciler ve özel öğrenme ihtiyaçları olan öğrenciler için özellikle değerli olduğunu vurgulamaktadırlar (Elliott ve Neal, 2016).…”
Section: öğRencilerin Dys'nin Kullanımı İle İlgili Kısıtlılıklara İlişkin Görüşleriunclassified