Students' mental models of the environment

Abstract

What are students' mental models of the environment? In what ways, if any, do students' mental models vary by grade level or community setting? These two questions guided the research reported in this article. The Environments Task was administered to students from 25 different teacher-classrooms. The student responses were first inductively analyzed in order to identify students' mental models of the environment. The second phase of analysis involved the statistical testing of the identified mental models. From this analysis four mental models emerged: Model 1, the environment as a place where animals/plants live-a natural place; Model 2, the environment as a place that supports life; Model 3, the environment as a place impacted or modified by human activity; and Model 4, the environment as a place where animals, plants, and humans live. The dominant mental model was Mental Model 1. Yet, a greater frequency of urban students than suburban and rural students held Mental Model 3. The implications to environmental science education are explored. ß

Getting past the blame game: Convergence and divergence in perceived threats to salmon resources among anglers and indigenous fishers in Canada’s lower Fraser River

“…This perspective, which is sometimes called a ''mental models'' approach, stresses that individual perceptions are patterned by group membership. Members of a group frequently have similar experiences, cultural backgrounds, ideologies, and social networks, thus patterning interpretation of events and situations (Denzau and North 1994;Shepardson et al 2007). These differences in knowledge and interpretations can be profound and provide deeper explanation of intergroup conflicts.…”

Preferencias de niños y niñas en relación con los artrópodos epigeos (Metazoa: Arthropoda) del desierto florido de Chile

“…Desafortunadamente la educación formal no estaría proveyendo a los niños de estas experiencias (Tomkins y Tunnicliffe, 2007;Camus, 2009). Pero hay otras fuentes para adquirir y/o aumentar esas experiencias y de hecho las investigaciones que existen sobre las percepciones y los conocimientos ambientales de los niños han mostrado que ellos dependen más de sus experiencias fuera de la escuela (Shepardson et al, 2007;Prokop et al, 2008Prokop et al, , 2011aProkop et al, , 2011b. Por eso es importante considerar no solo la educación formal sino la educación informal, creando un perfil total e integrado de la educación de un niño.…”

Concepções de Ambiente de Futuras Professoras Portuguesas: um estudo de caso

“…Inúmeros estudos têm sido desenvolvidos com crianças e jovens com o objetivo de identificar as suas concepções de ambiente (ALERBY, 2000;ALMEIDA et al, 2011;BARRAZA, 1999;KALVAITIS;MONHARDT, 2012;PETOCZ, 2002;SHEPARDSON, 2005;SHEPARDSON et al, 2007). Alguns desses estudos recorrem à análise de desenhos elaborados pelas crianças (ALERBY, 2000;BARRAZA, 1999;KALVAITIS;MONHARDT, 2012;SHEPARDSON, 2005;SHEPARDSON et al, 2007), narrativas (KALVAITIS;MONHARDT, 2012;SHEPARDSON, 2005;SHEPARDSON et al, 2007) e fotografias (SHEPARDSON, 2005;SHEPARDSON et al, 2007).…”

“…Alguns desses estudos recorrem à análise de desenhos elaborados pelas crianças (ALERBY, 2000;BARRAZA, 1999;KALVAITIS;MONHARDT, 2012;SHEPARDSON, 2005;SHEPARDSON et al, 2007), narrativas (KALVAITIS;MONHARDT, 2012;SHEPARDSON, 2005;SHEPARDSON et al, 2007) e fotografias (SHEPARDSON, 2005;SHEPARDSON et al, 2007). Shepardson (2005) constatou, no seu estudo com 81 alunos do ensino médio nos Estados Unidos da América, que o ambiente foi associado a uma paisagem natural e que as paisagens alteradas pelo homem não foram consideradas parte integrante do ambiente.…”