Students’ knowledge and attitudes towards GMOs and nanotechnology

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate knowledge and attitudes toward genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and nanotechnology among the Canadian youth demographic. The primary objective of this pilot study was to investigate the knowledge and attitudes toward GMOs and nanotechnology among first year university students. The secondary objective was to compare knowledge and attitudes toward GMOs and nanotechnology among students studying nutrition as to students who do not study nutrition. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire was developed by researchers and student volunteers. This questionnaire was distributed to first year university classes at Western University. The multiple-choice questions were analyzed using SAS, and open-ended questions were analyzed using theme analysis. Findings GMO knowledge was strong for both populations, however questions related to the percentage of GM foods grown in Canada indicated nutrition students had a stronger GMO knowledge (p = 0.031). Open-ended questions revealed overall attitudes toward GMOs were either unsure or negative between both populations. Nutrition students had a more positive attitude toward nanotechnology, and a slightly stronger knowledge regarding applications of nanotechnology (p = 0.006). Theme analysis indicated that participants enrolled in nutritional studies were less apprehensive toward GMOs. No differences were indicated in open-ended questions related to nanotechnology between both groups, which may be due to the lack of awareness related to the novelty of the technology. Research limitations/implications Without a validated questionnaire, this reduces the reliability of the results from the questionnaire. The questionnaire was carefully designed by combining previous studies questionnaires, as well as producing questions from related literature, which increases the reliability and accuracy of the questionnaire. In addition, the questionnaires underwent several rounds of pre-piloting as well as multiple revisions with current health-care professions to increase the reliability and accuracy of the questionnaire. Practical implications This study will assist in understanding the current knowledge of GMOs and nanotechnology among first year university students. This will then allow us to understand if knowledge has a factor in altering students’ attitudes toward these technologies. If students do not have a strong knowledge toward these technologies, then this may lead to the potential implementation of education regarding GMOs and nanotechnology. As these technologies are emerging and being used in everyday food items, individuals should be aware of the implications, as well as the benefits of these technologies. Originality/value This is the first study regarding this topic in Canada. Results from this study provide baseline data that may be used to conduct future research.

The link between nutrition and dental erosion: what do students know?

“…Because consideration, awareness and knowledge of dental erosion provided as part of the education of these two disciplines might be beneficial to developing strategies for improved collaboration, this study was planned and conducted. The questionnaire developed by the researchers was used in conducting this study, similar to the various studies evaluating students' attitudes and behaviors on different subjects (Soni et al , 2018; Hamilton and Hekmat, 2018; Hekmat and Dawson, 2019).…”

Attitude and labelling preferences towards gene-edited food: a consumer study amongst millennials and Generation Z

“…Furthermore, educational background has been shown to influence GM food attitudes: e.g. life scientists were more favourable towards GMOs (Scott et al , 2018), while those with a nutrition background were more aware of, though not necessarily more positive about GM food (Hekmat and Dowson, 2018). The importance of educational background was further emphasized in consumer research with youth (Florek-Łuszczki et al , 2016), with studies demonstrating a positive influence of biology-related education (Maes et al , 2017).…”

Perceptions of genetically modified and bioengineered organisms and corresponding food labels among undergraduate students at Binghamton University

“…The questions regarding attitudes toward GMOs showed that overall both populations either felt unsure or held negative attitudes about GMOs. However, theme analysis of open-ended responses showed that the students studying nutrition were less apprehensive of GMOs in general (Hekmat and Dawson, 2019). Therefore, educational background in terms of college majors and classes taken can lead to differing perceptions related to biotechnology.…”

“…Following methods of similar university-based studies, we attempt to understand perceptions of novel phenomena in the food system and suggest that future research expand upon our research by way of a larger sample size with wider demographics. While past research has studied labeling, value-based attributes of food and preferences among university students (Silva et al ., 2019; Hillmire and Schnitker, 2020), including specifically GMO and GMO-free labels (Oselinsky et al ., 2021), and others have assessed students' knowledge and attitudes of GMOs (Hekmat and Dawson, 2019), our research will look at perceptions and consumer preferences related to the new bioengineered label and associated terminology.…”