2017
DOI: 10.3148/cjdpr-2016-024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ Food Intake from Home-Packed Lunches in the Traditional versus Balanced School Day

Abstract: The BSD may have unintended negative consequences on the type and amount of foods packed in school lunches. Support for families should focus on encouraging more vegetables and fruit and fewer SSBs and snacks in packed lunches.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research indicates that when compared with students following the traditional school day, a greater number of snack servings are both packed and consumed in the balanced school day. 31 Additionally, Dorman et al 2 found students following the balanced school day schedule had significantly more beverages per day than those following the traditional schedule, and Neilson et al 31 found more balanced school day students had a sugar-sweetened beverage packed in their lunch compared to students following the traditional school day. Although the balanced school day may have unintended negative consequences on the quality and quantity of foods packed for school lunches, 31 there is limited data on the impact of this schedule on children's eating habits 9 or parental school lunch packing habits.…”
Section: Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research indicates that when compared with students following the traditional school day, a greater number of snack servings are both packed and consumed in the balanced school day. 31 Additionally, Dorman et al 2 found students following the balanced school day schedule had significantly more beverages per day than those following the traditional schedule, and Neilson et al 31 found more balanced school day students had a sugar-sweetened beverage packed in their lunch compared to students following the traditional school day. Although the balanced school day may have unintended negative consequences on the quality and quantity of foods packed for school lunches, 31 there is limited data on the impact of this schedule on children's eating habits 9 or parental school lunch packing habits.…”
Section: Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is similar to the standards set by the United States National School Lunch Program, which uses one-third of the 1989 Recommended Daily Allowances for energy, protein, iron, calcium, vitamin A, and vitamin C as minimal nutritional quality criteria for school meals (United States Department of Agriculture 2012). A similar approach has also been used in previous Canadian studies that used one-third of the daily recommended intakes as nutritional criteria for meals consumed at school (Taylor et al 2012;Neilson et al 2017). For the C-HEI, diet quality categories have been previously established (Garriguet 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United Kingdom, 1 study examining dietary contributions of nutrients from lunch among older adolescents reported relatively lower intakes of vitamin C, folate, calcium, and iron compared with the mean caloric contribution (Prynne et al 2013). In Canada, a limited number of studies from regional, context-specific samples have examined in-school dietary intakes suggesting overall poor dietary practices (Woodruff et al 2010;Taylor et al 2012;Ahmadi et al 2015;Neilson et al 2017), but no study has assessed the dietary contributions from foods eaten at school in relation to whole-day intakes or compared nutrient intake patterns between school and non-school hours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study conducted a secondary analysis of data available from another study [ 32 ]. Elementary school principals in the Thames Valley District School Board, who agreed to host this study, facilitated recruitment of grade 3 and 4 students (aged 7 to 10 years).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%