2015
DOI: 10.12691/education-3-5-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students Facing the Future: New Pedagogical Strategies in Forming a University Upbringing Culture

Abstract: Global challenges of the 21 st century show that the upbringing of a harmonious personality is a central problem for the contemporary higher education system. It is particularly relevant for Russia, which has experienced recent large shocks, associated with the breaking of social order. In this regard, there is a need to find new pedagogical strategies to support the development of a student's personality, in order to intensity the process of forming positive value orientations among young people. This require… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A gap was detected in instruments that follow a design from a mixed multifactorial approach (Pedagogical-psychological), and, therefore, their theoretical structure had not been empirically validated through confirmatory factorial analysis (Chapman, 2003;Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003;Wang et al, 2011;Yazzie-Mintz, 2010). Thus, the main objective of this study was to develop an instrument capable of measuring educational engagement, based on a theoretical model that integrates the key factors identified in the scientific literature: motivations (Meyer, 2010;Mitra, & Serrière, 2012;O'Brien & Lai, 2011;Ryan & Deci, 2009;Zyngier, 2011), values (Eccles, 2008;Rumberger, 2011;Vickers et al, 2014;Williams & Williams, 2011), learning contexts (Gazelle, 2006;Hamre & Pianta, 2005;Reeve & Jang, 2006;Reeve et al, 2004;Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1996;Shernoff, 2012;Zhang et al, 2009), emotional estate (Harris, 2008;Oriol, Mendoza, Covarrubias & Molina, 2017;Parsons & Taylor, 2011;Serrano & Andreu, 2016) and management strategies (Brickman et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A gap was detected in instruments that follow a design from a mixed multifactorial approach (Pedagogical-psychological), and, therefore, their theoretical structure had not been empirically validated through confirmatory factorial analysis (Chapman, 2003;Schaufeli & Bakker, 2003;Wang et al, 2011;Yazzie-Mintz, 2010). Thus, the main objective of this study was to develop an instrument capable of measuring educational engagement, based on a theoretical model that integrates the key factors identified in the scientific literature: motivations (Meyer, 2010;Mitra, & Serrière, 2012;O'Brien & Lai, 2011;Ryan & Deci, 2009;Zyngier, 2011), values (Eccles, 2008;Rumberger, 2011;Vickers et al, 2014;Williams & Williams, 2011), learning contexts (Gazelle, 2006;Hamre & Pianta, 2005;Reeve & Jang, 2006;Reeve et al, 2004;Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1996;Shernoff, 2012;Zhang et al, 2009), emotional estate (Harris, 2008;Oriol, Mendoza, Covarrubias & Molina, 2017;Parsons & Taylor, 2011;Serrano & Andreu, 2016) and management strategies (Brickman et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have explored the ways in which the personal and interpersonal values of students, acquired through interaction with family, friends or educators, have a substantial influence on the development of their academic engagement (Eccles, 2008;Rumberger, 2011;Vickers et al, 2014;Williams & Williams, 2011) Another key aspect for the development and understanding of engagement is the learning context (Gazelle, 2006;Hamre & Pianta, 2005;Reeve & Jang, 2006;Reeve et al, 2004;Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1996;Shernoff, 2012;Zhang et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2009). Allodi (2010) believes that new research that seeks to gain an in-depth understanding of engagement should incorporate measures that include information on learning contexts, including classroom climates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%