Students’ experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning environments

Abstract

This chapter describes an explorative study carried out to gain response from distance students on their experiences with collaborative learning in asynchronous computersupported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments. In addition, this study also attempts to have a good grip of crucial aspects concerning collaborative learning. The study was undertaken among distance learners from the Open University of the Netherlands who were working in groups of four to eleven persons. During and after the course students' experiences with collaborative learning were measured and after the course also students' satisfaction with collaborative learning was assessed. The finding revealed that distance learners appreciate the opportunities to work collaboratively. They show positive experiences and are quite satisfied with collaborative learning. This study also explored individual as well as course characteristics that influenced aspects of collaborative learning, and also aspects of collaborative learning that influenced students' satisfaction. The findings suggested that a group product influences regulation of group processes and group cohesion influences students' satisfaction with collaborative learning.Nowadays computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environments are viewed as an important electronic learning medium for distance education. CSCL environments can be described as a context where the computer facilitates interactions among learners for acquisition of knowledge, skills and attitudes (Dillenbourg, 1999; Kaye, 1992; Koschman, 1996). Working together while accomplishing a task is seen as a characteristic of a powerful learning environment, aiming at active construction of knowledge (Van Merriënboer & Paas, 2003). Through a process of interaction and negotiation students have an active and constructive role in the learning process.Research in recent years has shown that CSCL environments have been used successfully to promote learning achievements in distance education. Harasim (1989) described the social, affective and cognitive benefits of collaborative group work for distance learners. From her study, she concluded that collaborative learning promotes more active and more effective learning for distance education. Hiltz (1995) also reported that students in collaborative learning conditions had more constructive learning processes and attained higher grades than students in other conditions. These environments provide distance learners the opportunity to work together and to practice critical reflection, conflict negotiation, and consensus building as in face-to-face learning environments.Besides, students are encouraged to exchange ideas, to share perspectives and arguments, and to use previous knowledge or experience in order to decide on the best solution for the problem to be solved.So, the use of CSCL environments can both help to overcome physical isolation between students and teachers, and help to improve learning.CSCL environments are often promoted as an open, safe, and trustable...

Collaboration, connectedness, and community: An examination of the factors influencing student persistence in virtual communities

“…The focus of learning is not limited to the knowledge of just the instructor but, rather, the instructor acts as a facilitator of the interaction among all involved parties. Members of the group control the collaboration process with input from the instructor, and it is the responsibility of the entire group to participate in all aspects of the process, including the diffusion of conflicts, contribution of ideas, and the achievement of learning goals (Dewiyanti, Brand-Gruwel, Jochems, & Broers, 2007).…”

“…Beyond the social aspect of CSCL, our research investigates how collaborative learning, when supported by technology, can enhance how students work in groups interactively and how technology can facilitate shared knowledge among the members of a group (Wang, 2009;Dewiyanti, Brand-Gruwel, Jochems, & Broers, 2007). While collaborative learning involves using technology to work in a group to collectively complete a task, each individual needs to also be accountable for his or her share of the work (Wang, 2009).…”

A model for providing emotion awareness and feedback using fuzzy logic in online learning

“…Working together, while accomplishing a task is seen as a characteristic of a powerful learning environment, aiming at active construction of knowledge. Through a process of interaction and negotiation students have an active and constructive role in the learning process (Dewiyanti 2007 lies on an emotion analysis model, which has been widely described in Arguedas & Daradoumis (2013) (Arguedas, Daradoumis & Xhafa, 2016a;2016b). This model is based on the Activity Theory (AT) (Engeström et al 1999) and describes a scenario where participants (teacher and students) work together and interact with specific objects to carry out goal-oriented activities.…”

Influence of web-aided cooperative learning environment on motivation and on self-efficacy belief in Biology teaching

“…In literature, there is a great deal of research demonstrating that web-aided cooperative learning applications have positive influence on students' achievements, views and attitudes towards lessons (Soller, 2001;Ling and Heng, 2006;Dewiyanti et al, 2007;Tseng et al, 2008;Liu and Tsai, 2008;El-Deghaidy and Nouby, 2008;Demirdağ, 2011). On the other hand, the number of studies conducted on WACLE applications in biology education is fairly limited (Vesisenaho et al, 2010).…”