2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-016-9496-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students’ experiences of learning with iPads in upper secondary school – a base for proto-TPACK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It is revealed that, TPACK is an effective framework not only for teacher education but also for primary and secondary education and it can be used for the benefit of both students (primary/secondary/high school) and teachers. There are studies found in the literature investigating the effects of course plans on teachers and students which are formed by TPACK framework (Brill, Listman & Kapila, 2015;Kontkanen et al, 2017;Hofer & Harris, 2010;Wetzel & Marshall, 2011;Doering et al, 2014;Aisyah, 2013). However, no research witnessed regarding the use of TPACK framework in the computing/informatics/programming courses curricula examining learning of students in the secondary school.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is revealed that, TPACK is an effective framework not only for teacher education but also for primary and secondary education and it can be used for the benefit of both students (primary/secondary/high school) and teachers. There are studies found in the literature investigating the effects of course plans on teachers and students which are formed by TPACK framework (Brill, Listman & Kapila, 2015;Kontkanen et al, 2017;Hofer & Harris, 2010;Wetzel & Marshall, 2011;Doering et al, 2014;Aisyah, 2013). However, no research witnessed regarding the use of TPACK framework in the computing/informatics/programming courses curricula examining learning of students in the secondary school.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surveys were based on previous empirical studies, from previous interviews, or by the authors according to the assessed concepts, but not from validated questionnaires linked to specific theoretical models. We noted that Norqvist (2016) and Kontkanen et al (2017) can be distinguished by their use of specific data collection methodologies. Norqvist (2016) used an original interview method based on the theory of group cognition.…”
Section: Methodologies In No-model-based Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He then determined whether the students spontaneously raised the use of tablets in order to assess the integration of this tool in the students' representations. Kontkanen et al (2017) based their methodology on the TPACK framework (Mishra and Koehler 2006). They asked students to write two advisory letters: one giving instructions for a new student about how to use tablets for learning and another for a new teacher about how to use tablets for teaching.…”
Section: Methodologies In No-model-based Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies, which used interviews focusing on particular contexts and tasks, found that students expressed negative perceptions in some instances (Duran and Aytaç 2016;Montrieux et al 2014). For example, students reported that tablets could cause problems by diverting attention (Duran and Aytaç 2016;Kontkanen et al 2017) or that using tablets could be problematic when the task involved taking notes and producing text using a virtual keyboard (Dündar and Akçayir 2014;Soffer and Yaron 2017).…”
Section: Acceptance Of Tablets As a Learning Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%