2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-498x.2012.00529.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students developing resources for students

Abstract: Given the ever-diversifying arena of multimedia instruction and the ability of students to be fully conversant with technology, this project demonstrates that students are ideal participants and creators of multimedia resources. It is hoped that such an approach will help to further develop the skill base of students, but will also provide an avenue of developing packages that are student user friendly, and that are focused towards particular curricula requirements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once again the focus can be on knowledge, understanding, and interpretation, but the audience to which the information is directed can be more varied than traditionally would be the case. Other ways of incorporating oral communication skills training could be the use of mock‐interviews, peer or faculty observation, simulation/role play or the creation of videos, audio casts etc., (Hargie et al, 1998; Van Dalen et al, 2001; Losh et al, 2005; Windish et al, 2005; Nuovo et al, 2006; Green and Hope, 2010; Yoo and Chae, 2011; Koenigsfeld et al, 2012; Pearce and Evans, 2012). In each case the method chosen can have a distinct anatomical flavor as appropriate.…”
Section: Anatomy and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once again the focus can be on knowledge, understanding, and interpretation, but the audience to which the information is directed can be more varied than traditionally would be the case. Other ways of incorporating oral communication skills training could be the use of mock‐interviews, peer or faculty observation, simulation/role play or the creation of videos, audio casts etc., (Hargie et al, 1998; Van Dalen et al, 2001; Losh et al, 2005; Windish et al, 2005; Nuovo et al, 2006; Green and Hope, 2010; Yoo and Chae, 2011; Koenigsfeld et al, 2012; Pearce and Evans, 2012). In each case the method chosen can have a distinct anatomical flavor as appropriate.…”
Section: Anatomy and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“the first dissection room experience”), creative writing exercises (e.g. a poem) or devising media releases or authoring opinion editorials and commentaries (Poirier et al, 1998; Bergman and Irvine, 2004; Rees and Sheard, 2004; Poronnik and Moni, 2006; Pearce and Evans, 2012; Evans, unpublished). In addition, course leaders can suggest students write mock grant applications or ethics proposals, prepare short review manuscripts or write abstracts for published papers (Reif‐Lehrer, 1992; Marusić and Marusić, 2003).…”
Section: Anatomy and Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation in the amount of peer‐to‐peer teaching could have accounted for some of the differences in module usage, as well as in examination performance. Peer‐teaching is an important component of the learning cycle (Brueckner and MacPherson, ; Pearce and Evans, ). Students that gained a better understanding of a region by using the module might have been more likely to lead a team‐teaching session among their peers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second and third year medical students helped develop these activities, which also served to promote vertical integration across the curriculum. Pearce and Evans () found that medical students were more committed to the material when they were actively part of the learning cycle (Pearce and Evans, ), and so student participation was considered here as crucial for ensuring that new program met student needs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artifacts could also be used as a tool for clinicians during patient/family consultations. Initiatives where students have been responsible for creating learning resources have been reported (Philip et al, 2008; Novak et al, 2011; Pearce and Evans, 2012). For those schools in geographical regions where the availability of resources and technologies is limited, or budgets are restricted, lower fidelity approaches could be used effectively (Chan and Cheng, 2011; Dixit et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Anatomical Project and Studio‐based Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%