Students' Conceptions of Tutor and Automated Feedback in Professional Writing

Abstract

Background Professional writing is an essential outcome for engineering graduates and hence a vital part of engineering education. To provide a successful learning experience for students engaged in writing activities, timely feedback is necessary. Providing this feedback to increasing numbers of students poses a major challenge for instructors. New automated systems work towards providing both timely and appropriate writing feedback, but students' views on automated feedback, and feedback in general, are not well understood. Purpose (Hypothesis) To contribute to a deeper understanding of students' conceptions of feedback from tutors and an automated system called Glosser, and how these conceptions are related to achievement. Design/Method Students in an engineering course worked in pairs to write an engineering report on e‐business. The design of the study involves in‐depth interviews and the analysis employs an approach in which student conceptions of automated feedback are investigated in relation to related feedback from their tutor, perceptions of automated feedback in general, and their academic achievement. Results Students' conceptions of feedback vary and can be grouped into cohesive and fragmented, which is consistent with other theoretical models. Close associations were found between more cohesive conceptions of feedback and better academic performance. Conclusions A student's conception of traditional and automated feedback is similar, being either cohesive or fragmented. Changing one may change the other. Deep learners see feedback as a way of learning about the topic whereas shallow learners see them as a way to improve the communication aspects of writing. Design considerations based on these results are discussed.

Adapting Progress Feedback and Emotional Support to Learner Personality

“…Motivation is a complicated concept, so we first wanted to establish through a literature review how it relates to personality, and how it can be influenced through feedback. The Intelligent Tutoring Systems community have started investigating the relationships between feedback types, momentary confidence and learning (Boyer et al, 2008;Calvo and Ellis, 2010). However, they do not provide a fine grained model of the relevant factors.…”

Come Together: Peer Review with Energy Engineering Students

“…Although, helping engineering students to learn how to write and communicate efficiently offers many challenges [19], in a context where writing and collaborative skills PAPER COME TOGETHER: PEER REVIEW WITH ENERGY ENGINEERING STUDENTS should be promoted [19] [11] [12], in particular in the engineering curricula [8] [10], the implementation of the cycle involved in giving/receiving/using feedback can be considered an adequate strategy to provide students with a meaningful learning experience.…”

Improving Student Lab Report Writing Performances in Materials and Manufacturing Laboratory Courses by Implementing a Rhetorical Approach to Writing

“…For this very reason, the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology [2] has addressed in criterion 3g that "an ability to communicate effectively" in the professional contexts is essential for accreditation, and engineering programs nationwide have implemented extensive writing components in their curricular. Although engineering undergraduates are exposed to writing curricula such as first-year composition in their early program of study, they sometimes have difficulties in meeting the expectations of writing within the discipline and in courses in the major (to list a few recent papers, [3,4]). …”

“…Often, these studies tend to focus on the efficacies of many instructional tools. These tools include tutoring support and automated feedback [3], peer evaluations [5,6], and self-evaluations [7], as well as the implementation of new instructional models such as the HPL (How People Learn) approach [4] and an inquiry-based approach [8], and the development of writing assessment standards and their implementations [9][10][11]. Most these studies implicitly rely on a "modes" approach, an approach that emphasizes formulas and templates.…”