Commitment has been extensively examined by researchers in a wide variety of contexts. The construct is considered important because it has been shown to be predictive of work-related attitudes and behaviors. However, the construct has only rarely been used to explain behavioral outcomes in educational contexts. It is likely that commitment has important implications for student behavior in colleges and universities. Based on the extant commitment literature in traditional workplace contexts, there may be reason to believe that high levels of commitment might be positively associated with students' engagement and negatively associated with students' intention to quit school. As such, the purpose of this study is to examine the construct of commitment and its outcomes in a university setting. Specifically, it provides a test of Meyer and Herscovitch's (2001) theoretical predictions about the combined effects of different components of undergraduate students' commitment to their university on their focal and discretionary behaviors. We contend that this study makes three important theoretical contributions to the organizational commitment literature in that it (a) investigates the interactive effects of different components of commitment on focal and discretionary behaviors which, with only a few exceptions (e.g., Gellatly, Meyer, & Luchak, 2006;Sinclair, Tucker, Wright, & Cullen, 2005;Wasti, 2005), has not been adequately done in the commitment literature; (b) examines the generalizability of the Meyer and Herscovitch (2001) model, particularly the outcomes of commitment, to a university student population; and (c) provides a starting point for the development of a synthesis of knowledge about behavior between the organizational behavior and management education literatures.A fourth purpose of this study is to examine the notion of the existence of a commitment "context effect" for normative commitment (NC). As explained in depth in the following
AbstractTheoretical concepts from the organizational behavior literature, including commitment, are rarely used to help explain university student behavior. The benefits of doing so might include the development of a synthesis of knowledge about the behavior of students in an organizational setting. Such a synthesis is important because it will help extend organizational commitment literature to student samples and will help explain student behavior as a result of their commitment. As such, the purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to test theoretical propositions advanced by Meyer and Herscovitch concerning the interactive effects of affective, normative, and continuance commitment on students' focal and discretionary behaviors and (b) to provide an exploratory examination of the notion of a commitment profile "context effect" for normative commitment for students in a university setting. Study measures were gathered from a sample of 287 undergraduate business students. Results showed support for interactive effects of the three components of commitment for both focal a...