Students as OERs (Open Educational Resources) co-creators

Andone, Diana; Mihaescu, Vlad; Vert, Silviu

doi:10.1109/icalt49669.2020.00017

Cited by 5 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, this can be relevant for those directing themselves to education-related careers or can be transferred to any training or coaching context in other career fields. Andone et al [40] in particular charge a small number of students with creating open educational resources as a way to enrich STEM undergraduate and postgraduate programmes and, at the same time, as an assessment from which students gain knowledge on best practices in education content creation. The qualitative data gathered from Andone et al's participating students (n = approx.…”

Section: Development Of Transferable Skillsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“… paper sample size sample description (UG/PG etc) effect size (if relevant) design country 1 Afolabi [ 37 ] n = 106 university undergraduates not applicable between-group pre-post-test design Nigeria 2 Al Abri & Dabbagh [ 38 ] n = 12 (11 graduate students, 1 course instructor) graduate students and course instructor not applicable sequential mixed-method design USA 3 Altunoglu [ 39 ] five focus groups (each with min. six students) university students not applicable interpretive qualitative case study design Turkey 4 Anglin & Edlund [ 30 ] n = 328 instructors of psychology for type of course where replication and reform issues are discussed: η 2 = 0.05 for graduate versus advanced undergraduate versus introductory undergraduate courses; η 2 = 0.18 for introductory methods versus general versus content courses; d = 0.84 for advanced undergraduate methods versus content courses; d = 0.93 for graduate methods versus other courses single time-point questionnaire study mainly USA ( n = 291) 5 Andone, Mihaescu, Vert, Ternauciuc, & Vasiu [ 40 ] n = 120 university undergraduates (bachelor students) and graduates (master students) not applicable ...…”

Section: Literature Search Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our review also highlighted that students can benefit from the teaching skills and the understanding of how education in general is structured [ 40 , 59 ]. For example, this can be relevant for those directing themselves to education-related careers or can be transferred to any training or coaching context in other career fields.…”

Section: Open and Reproducible Scholarship And Students' Scientific L...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness and reproducibility of research, characterized by increased interest and promotion of open and transparent research practices. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Specifically, a critical overview of the literature which investigates how integrating open and reproducible science may influence student outcomes is needed. In this paper, we provide the first critical review of literature surrounding the integration of open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning and its associated outcomes in students. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship appears to be associated with (i) students' scientific literacies (i.e. students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science and the development of transferable skills); (ii) student engagement (i.e. motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration and engagement in open research) and (iii) students' attitudes towards science (i.e. trust in science and confidence in research findings). However, our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within pedagogical research, including more interventional and experimental evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship.

show abstract

Section: Development Of Transferable Skillsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Search Strategymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Open and Reproducible Scholarship And Students' Scientific L...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our review also highlighted that students can benefit from the teaching skills and the understanding of how education in general is structured (Andone et al, 2020;Ryan, 2020).…”

Section: Development Of Transferable Skillsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…or can be transferred to any training or coaching context in other career fields Andone et al (2020). in particular charge a small number of students with creating open educational resources as a way to enrich a STEM undergraduate and postgraduate programmes and, at the same time, as an assessment from which students gain knowledge on best practices in education content creation.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Teaching Open and Reproducible Scholarship: A Critical Review of the Evidence Base for Current Pedagogical Methods and their Outcomes

Pownall¹,

König²,

Slack³

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, the scientific community has called for improvements in the credibility, robustness, and reproducibility of research, characterized by higher standards of scientific evidence, increased interest in open practices, and promotion of transparency. While progress has been positive, there is a lack of consideration about how this approach can be embedded into undergraduate and postgraduate research training. Currently, the impact of integrating an open and reproducible approach into the curriculum on student outcomes is not well articulated in the literature. Therefore, in this paper, we provide the first comprehensivereview of how integrating open and reproducible scholarship into teaching and learning may impact students, using a large-scale, collaborative, team-science approach. Our review highlighted how embedding open and reproducible scholarship may impact: (1) students’ scientific literacies (i.e., students’ understanding of open research, consumption of science, and the development of transferable skills); (2) student engagement (i.e., motivation and engagement with learning, collaboration, and engagement in open research), and (3) students’attitudes towards science (i.e., trust in science and confidence in research findings). Our review also identified a need for more robust and rigorous methods within evaluations of teaching practice. We discuss implications for teaching and learning scholarship in this area.

show abstract

Topic Modelling for Automatically Identification of Relevant Concepts Discussed in Academic Documents

Veronica,

Sylvie,

De Frank

2023

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Students as OERs (Open Educational Resources) co-creators

Cited by 5 publications

References 6 publications

Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Teaching open and reproducible scholarship: a critical review of the evidence base for current pedagogical methods and their outcomes

Teaching Open and Reproducible Scholarship: A Critical Review of the Evidence Base for Current Pedagogical Methods and their Outcomes

Topic Modelling for Automatically Identification of Relevant Concepts Discussed in Academic Documents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About