2010
DOI: 10.1177/1538513210392002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Students and the Second Ghetto: Federal Legislation, Urban Politics, and Campus Planning at the University of Chicago

Abstract: In the years after World War II, the University of Chicago (U of C) enjoyed a position as a leader in higher education with the ability to help provide for national economic growth and global security through professional education and scientific research. It also faced a dramatically changing set of neighborhood conditions that threatened its leadership status. University administrators pursued an ambitious agenda of redevelopment and neighborhood management in South East Chicago in order to fight a wave of r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence across numerous national contexts has indicated that replicating the experience of successful regions in other cities and universities is no simple matter (POWER and MALMBERG, 2008;ISAKSEN and KARLSEN, 2010;TOMANEY and WRAY, 2011). In the United States, for example, major research universities including Chicago, Berkeley, Harvard and Johns Hopkins only have a marginal stimulative impact on their immediate local economies; apart from that indirectly generated by salaries, general expenditures, and sourcing dynamics (RUTHERFORD and HOLMES, 2008, p. 250;WINLING, 2011). We argue there is a need to broaden our analytical, empirical and geographic focus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence across numerous national contexts has indicated that replicating the experience of successful regions in other cities and universities is no simple matter (POWER and MALMBERG, 2008;ISAKSEN and KARLSEN, 2010;TOMANEY and WRAY, 2011). In the United States, for example, major research universities including Chicago, Berkeley, Harvard and Johns Hopkins only have a marginal stimulative impact on their immediate local economies; apart from that indirectly generated by salaries, general expenditures, and sourcing dynamics (RUTHERFORD and HOLMES, 2008, p. 250;WINLING, 2011). We argue there is a need to broaden our analytical, empirical and geographic focus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These events ignited the era of long, hot summers of violent urban rebellions in the United States. Over the next four years, hundreds of urban rebellions occurred as Black Power supplanted the Civil Rights Movement as the engine driving the African American freedom struggle [108,115,116].…”
Section: Interruption Of University Civic Engagement 10mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, university investments in slum clearance fundamentally changed the fabric of neighborhoods, often resulting in three outcomes (Carriere 2011;Winling 2011). First, universities and cities alike viewed the program as an opportunity to "clean house," clearing away physical, social, and economic blight in the name of "improvement" (Teaford 2000;Winling 2011). Broad displacement and demolition frequently preceded the development of new university facilities, including libraries, dorms, and laboratories.…”
Section: Universities and Place In The Post-wwii Landscapementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anchor institution literature, to date, largely favors universitycommunity engagement and revitalization strategies. Many articles criticize the legacy of universities-and other institutions-in urban neighborhoods, but those critiques are primarily set in Urban Renewal (e.g., Carriere 2011;Pritchett 2003;Teaford 2000;Winling 2011). In contrast, there are few critical assessments of recent university investments in neighborhoods (e.g., Etienne 2012).…”
Section: University Revitalization Research: Pushing Back and Unanswered Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%