1972
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.1972.tb01921.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student wastage at Edinburgh University II. A prediction scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All take a number of predictor variables and combine them in some way; an ‘at‐risk’ threshold is then set such that failure is predicted if performance falls below this level. The predictors are most commonly class tests and/or university selection data but some studies have used social and personality variables (Kapur 1972). There is little consistency in the way predictors arc combined; important differences in ‘background factors’(difficulty of subject matter, support for students, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All take a number of predictor variables and combine them in some way; an ‘at‐risk’ threshold is then set such that failure is predicted if performance falls below this level. The predictors are most commonly class tests and/or university selection data but some studies have used social and personality variables (Kapur 1972). There is little consistency in the way predictors arc combined; important differences in ‘background factors’(difficulty of subject matter, support for students, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have developed and evaluated prediction schemes, using academic and other criteria combined in a variety of ways (Nisbett & Welsh 1966; Kapur 1972; McGuire 1977; Sherwin & Child 1976; Herman & Veloski 1981). According to Wainer & Thissen (1976), systems which assume equal contributions by all the explanatory variables are simpler to devise and also yield results comparable in predictive validity to those achieved by more complex regression models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%