This paper is an interpretive exploration of the$gure of the monsfrous child as it appears in the experiences of student-teachers entering the community of teaching. f t also considers how interpretive work is itself haunted by this Jigure and how, iherefore, teaching itself might be considered an interpretive activity.When I went to my practicum school the first day, I felt about this high, like a little kid again, going to school for the first time, beginning all over again, right from the beginning. And my cooperating teacher was, like, my teacher and I was a little kid in Grade One. I was so afraid, but I knew I could get through it if I just kept going. The liminal space indicated by the hyphenation 'student-teacher' is a haunted and generative space, full of tales told to anyone who will listen. Those of us involved in the practicum experience often pass over a consideration of the deep mythopoetic meaning of these tales in favour of interventions aimed at facilitating and easing this transition. Such well-intentioned efforts can all too easily be premised on the implicit assumption that there is no deep narrative-interpretive structure to these transitions, and that every difficulty confronted is somehow avoidable, that every pain points to a pathological condition-a dis-ease requiring a cure [ 13. From such a pathologicalkurative premise, student-teaching can easily devolve into the belief that becoming a teacher would be simple and painless if only we could orchestrate it well enough. Perhaps even worse, we can mistakenly believe that simply making our student-teachers feel good is a sign of both their success and ours.The interpretive effort of re-mythologizing pedagogy, found in the recent work of Jane White (1989) and Fay Head (1992) (see also Jardine and Field 1992), is aimed at restoring the phenomenon of student-teaching and its existential transformations to their full 'original difficulty' (Caputo, 1987). These papers begin to make this difficult liminal experience readable and understandable and decipherable as something more than simply an array of problems to be fixed. To put it more strongly, this work suggests that there are deep and irremediable difficulties inherent in the liminal space traversed by student-teachers that cannot and should not b e f i e d . Not all difficulties are a result of lack of effort or diligence or preparation or information, and understanding student-teaching in such a pathological fashion not only foregoes a collective, communal understanding of its deep human meaning (with all of the ways in which such commonly held understanding can help to make the burden of those difficulties more bearable). Pathologizing student-teaching can also subvert the transformative initiatory process itself (where one "becomes another" [Eliade, 1975[Eliade, , p. 1651) by attempting to disassemble this often long and occasionally painful transformation of who one deeply is into the hurried accumulation of skills and techniques. And, if we take even a cursory look at the publishing i...