2016
DOI: 10.5032/jae.2016.03001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Teacher Dialogue in an Electronic Community of Practice: Cognition Level Related to the INTASC Standards

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principals (The learner and learning, content, instructional practice, and professional responsibility) and the standards are as shown in Table 1. Clark and Paulsen (2016) discussed that when teachers use all the INTASC standards, they could help in developing their students' content knowledge, communication and cognitive skills, understanding the central concept of the curriculum, solving problems, and dealing with instructions (Moss & Lee, 2010). Like Kentucky Department of Education (2020), the university adopted a teaching framework that merges the INTASC standards and the Danielson Framework.…”
Section: Teaching Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principals (The learner and learning, content, instructional practice, and professional responsibility) and the standards are as shown in Table 1. Clark and Paulsen (2016) discussed that when teachers use all the INTASC standards, they could help in developing their students' content knowledge, communication and cognitive skills, understanding the central concept of the curriculum, solving problems, and dealing with instructions (Moss & Lee, 2010). Like Kentucky Department of Education (2020), the university adopted a teaching framework that merges the INTASC standards and the Danielson Framework.…”
Section: Teaching Performancementioning
confidence: 99%