2002
DOI: 10.1080/02680930210140257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student retention in higher education: the role of institutional habitus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
529
2
65

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 737 publications
(610 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
14
529
2
65
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies which have investigated students' sense of belonging in relation to their study progress and persistence in higher education, the theoretical framework has often been based on the concept of institutional habitus (Berger 2000;Thomas 2002;Zepke et al 2006). According to Berger each campus is composed of students who generally share a common habitus which to some extent is congruent with the organizational habitus of that institution.…”
Section: Sense Of Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies which have investigated students' sense of belonging in relation to their study progress and persistence in higher education, the theoretical framework has often been based on the concept of institutional habitus (Berger 2000;Thomas 2002;Zepke et al 2006). According to Berger each campus is composed of students who generally share a common habitus which to some extent is congruent with the organizational habitus of that institution.…”
Section: Sense Of Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…student success (Thomas, 2002;Young et al, 2007). Allowing students to spend more time in smaller groups encourages a greater sense of belonging and solidarity, aiding student engagement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At institutions where there was ''significant numbers of students of the same age, class and/or ethnicity'' (p. 270), non-traditional students still felt a sense of alienation and isolation. It is possible that this sense of nonbelonging stems less from specific student-related characteristics and more from the ''institutional habitus'' of the university (Thomas 2002) As Read et al remark: Firstly, the student experiences institutional 'controls' through, for example, the 'regulated communications' of the lecture, the essay and the examination, and the rewards and punishments of the grading system. Secondly, the student is constrained by her or his own 'knowledge' of what it is to be a 'good' student, a knowledge which has been constructed through socially dominant discourses, including those produced and maintained by the university itself.…”
Section: Fatalistic Suicidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such 'knowledges' and practices are legitimated by their 'naturalization': they come to be seen as the only or 'natural' way of thinking or acting (2003, p. 269). Thomas (2002) also concludes that ''educational institutions are able to determine what values, language and knowledge are regarded as legitimate'' (p. 431). If non-traditional students feel that their knowledge is undervalued and that they hold inappropriate cultural norms and practices, then, she argues, they may be more likely to drop out.…”
Section: Fatalistic Suicidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation