2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevstper.10.013101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student reasoning about electrostatic and gravitational potential energy: An exploratory study with interdisciplinary consequences

Abstract: This paper describes an investigation into student reasoning about potential energy in the context of introductory electrostatics. Similar incorrect reasoning patterns emerged both in written questions administered after relevant instruction and in one-on-one interviews. These reasoning patterns are also prevalent in responses to questions posed about gravitational potential energy in the context of universal gravitation in introductory mechanics. This finding is relevant for interdisciplinary research, becaus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common justification for these incorrect responses was simply that the closer the objects are, the greater the energy of the system, without any further explanation. This response has been commonly observed in other contexts as well (Lindsey, 2014). Other common justifications provided by students to support their incorrect answers are summarized in Table 4.…”
Section: Demonstrating a Gap In Student Understandingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The most common justification for these incorrect responses was simply that the closer the objects are, the greater the energy of the system, without any further explanation. This response has been commonly observed in other contexts as well (Lindsey, 2014). Other common justifications provided by students to support their incorrect answers are summarized in Table 4.…”
Section: Demonstrating a Gap In Student Understandingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Once again, the task still worked, but not as intended. The analogy is well-known in both German and US-American context, including the confusion between (potential) energy and potential [30].…”
Section: Treating a Constant Voltage Source As Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of prevalent student difficulties is implicitly represented in our student learning targets. Targets are separated into several broad categories: (A) connections of energy and everyday experiences [23][24][25]; (B) choice of system [26][27][28][29]; (C) identification of and differentiation between energy and other physics concepts [30,31]; (D) transfer of energy [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]; (E) use of mathematics; (F) use of representations [26,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38]; and (G) use of other science practices [40].…”
Section: B Content Knowledge For Teaching Energy Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%