2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10755-019-09484-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Philanthropy and Community Engagement: A Program Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This research also builds upon and extends past work in several ways. First, much past work has focused on the prosociality development of children (e.g., Padilla-Walker & Carlo, 2014) and the impact of classroom-based prosociality interventions (e.g., Benz et al, 2020;Santos et al, 2011). The present work illustrates that prosociality can continue to develop and be positively shaped in adolescence and that interventions implemented in other contexts in adolescents' lives, like organized sport, may be rich, important environments to develop prosociality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…This research also builds upon and extends past work in several ways. First, much past work has focused on the prosociality development of children (e.g., Padilla-Walker & Carlo, 2014) and the impact of classroom-based prosociality interventions (e.g., Benz et al, 2020;Santos et al, 2011). The present work illustrates that prosociality can continue to develop and be positively shaped in adolescence and that interventions implemented in other contexts in adolescents' lives, like organized sport, may be rich, important environments to develop prosociality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…As we may find from the table below, most of the studies found philanthropy education to exert a positive impact on both money and time donation (e.g. Benz, et al 2020;McDougle, McDonald, et al 2017;Olberding, 2012). However, some studies also found some different results (e.g.…”
Section: Philanthropy Educationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Each online participant can match his or her offline role. Compared with micro public welfare, college [10] students' micro public welfare defines the participants, that is, college students initiate and organize micro public welfare by means of network platforms (QQ, Douban, email group, Weibo, wechat and other platforms) and use network tools and technologies, and complete the specific [11] implementation process of micro public welfare activities in real life, and finally realize the concern for others. Compared with micro public welfare, college students' micro public welfare has obvious group characteristics of college students.…”
Section: Literature Review 131 An Analysis Of the Concepts Related To...mentioning
confidence: 99%