Like most other branches of applied psychology, school psychology has adopted a narrow interpretation of ethics that gives primacy to the welfare of the individual client at the expense of actions designed to enhance the welfare of the entire community. It is argued that the moral responsibilities of school psychologists toward their clients and society at large necessitate a more active pursuit of social ethics. The methods whereby this goal may be attained and the likely obstacles to be encountered in the promotion of more socially sensitive approaches in school psychology are presented. Finally, a blueprint for the implementation of social ethics in the profession is proposed. It is obvious that without an improvement in the social conditions in which many of our clients live, they will continue to experience a myriad of emotional disorders (Albee, 1989; Honig, 1986a, 1986b; Mirowsky & Ross, 1989; Commission on Prevention of Mental-Emotional Disabilities, 1987). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, recently adopted by its general assembly, "refers many times to the maintenance of the child's mental health, as well as to the preconditions for achieving these ends (e.g., adequate shelter, nutrition, health care, education)" (Cohen & Naimark, 1991, p. 63). Hence, school psychologists have a moral responsibility to promote not only the wellbeing of their clients but also of the environments where their clients function and develop. In spite of the fact that very few school psychologists will likely dispute these assertions, our profession has devoted a disproportionate amount of