Many cultural and institutional barriers
have prevented chemistry
from realizing greater calls for diversity in academia. Though recent
work has elucidated how the measures of success used in academia can
disadvantage students from underrepresented groups at the undergraduate
level, thorough understanding of how success metrics are valued by
minoritized students at the graduate level is lacking. Here, we use
data generated from the UC Berkeley Department of Chemistry’s
student-led climate survey to investigate both how graduate students
prioritize and how faculty employ common metrics for graduate student
success. Results revealed that faculty undervalued metrics preferred
by students from underrepresented groups (URGs) in STEM such as underrepresented
people of color, women, LGBTQ+ students, and first-generation students.
Priorities of students that do not identify as underrepresented displayed
no statistically significant differences compared to faculty values.
Questions regarding publication record, one of the often-used measures
of success in STEM academia, suggest that graduate students, particularly
those belonging to URGs, challenge the use of publication record as
the primary metric of success in graduate school. These findings highlight
some of the ways that definitions of academic success can be exclusionary
for graduate students from underrepresented backgrounds and encourage
re-envisioning graduate school success in ways that reflect the values
of diverse student populations.