Student Initiatives and Missed Learning Opportunities in an IRF Sequence: A Single Case Analysis

Abstract

Most conversation analysis (CA) studies of the initiation-response-feedback (IRF; Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975) sequence have focused on teacher actions in the feedback move. In this article, I use CA to analyze student initiatives (Waring, 2011) within an IRF sequence in one excerpt from a Chinese as a foreign language class. The excerpt features a teacher using an IRF sequence to engage her students in a sentence-based translation exercise. I demonstrate how a student initiates a sequence following the teacher's feedback move to make a negative assessment of the pragmatic soundness of the sentences, thus casting doubt on the teacher's epistemic authority. This initiating action and the subsequent interaction it generates bring contingency into the IRF sequence and create potential learning opportunities. As the teacher contends with the contingency, issues related to epistemic asymmetry and L1 and L2 identities are brought to the surface. Additionally, the potential opportunities to discuss the different pragmatic forces between yao in Chinese and to want in English when used in making requests are missed at multiple sequential junctures. Based on the analysis, I discuss teacher-student epistemic social relations within the IRF sequence and a methodological issue concerning the analysis of missed learning opportunities. I also offer reflection on how CA can be used for pedagogical intervention. 88 constructive and helpful comments and suggestions on the paper. Thanks to their comments and suggestions, the paper was greatly improved. To all of them, I owe my gratitude. I would also like to thank Lan and her students for allowing me to conduct research in their class. Without their permission, this study would not have been possible.

Negotiating Power In L2 Synchronous Online Peer Response Groups

“…The four excerpts were deemed significant to the present study since they shed light on how advice delivery and receipt are conducted in an institutional activity. The selection criterion used in my study (as in Li, 2013) adheres to Mori's (2004) argument that "the selection of a particular case for the publication of its CA-based analysis may be motivated by the significance of the case in a given field" (p. 539).…”

Dynamics in a Mandarin lesson in a British secondary school: Asymmetric power and teacher-student rapport management

“…The conflict between teachers and students has attracted much interest from researchers, particularly the unexpectedly chaotic and disorderly nature of self-selection in the context of classroom talk (Emanuelsson & Sahlstrom, 2008). For example, in classes where students are learning Chinese as a second language, Li (2013) explained how a teacher tried to maintain her authority while responding to a learner's challenging reactions but failed in achieving the pedagogical goals. In another Mandarin learning class, Li (2019) investigated a conflict classroom talk between a teacher and a group of students.…”

Estrategias discursivas y la opinión del alumnado sobre la interacción con el docente

“…De la misma manera, Waring (2011) indagó la agencia del aprendiz en la formación de oportunidades de aprendizaje, encontrando y dividiendo sus iniciativas de aprendizaje en tres bloques diferentes: 1) cuando el alumno inicia el turno; 2) cuando hay una autoselección donde el alumno tiene la iniciativa de responder, y 3) cuando se puede explotar un turno asignado para comenzar una secuencia; los resultados muestran que el alumno es capaz de estructurar oportunidades de aprendizaje mostrando su agencia; sin embargo hizo notar que es necesario encontrar un balance donde los alumnos sean capaces de contribuir más que afectar la agenda del docente durante sus iniciativas. Li (2013) también se interesó por las iniciativas del estudiante al considerarlas como generadoras de contingencia en la secuencia IRF, y también capaces de crear oportunidades de aprendizaje. Fundando su investigación en los hallazgos de Waring (2011) buscaba cumplir dos propósitos: demostrar cómo el análisis de la conversación en general puede proporcionar luz en los momentos pedagógicamente significantes en la interacción del aula, e ilustrar cómo docentes de lenguas extranjeras y en particular docentes de lengua china en particular pueden beneficiarse de un microanálisis de sus prácticas y de las de otros.…”