2014
DOI: 10.3390/educsci4040247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Engagement and Blended Learning: Making the Assessment Connection

Abstract: There is an increased focus on student engagement and blended approaches to learning in higher education. This article demonstrates how collaborative learning applications and a blended approach to learning can be used to design and support assessment activities that increase levels of student engagement with course concepts, their peers, faculty and external experts, leading to increased student success and satisfaction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
57
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This places the course in a unique position of being neither fully online since some definitions of online learning would require 100 % asynchronous interaction nor face to face (since students were not in the same physical space). Blended learning definitions vary (Vaughan 2014), but a consistently used definition is that it is the ''organic integration of thoughtfully selected and complementary face-to-face and online approaches and technologies'' (Garrison and Vaughan 2008, p. 148). The sense of blending face-toface and online modalities is echoed by other researchers (Graham 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This places the course in a unique position of being neither fully online since some definitions of online learning would require 100 % asynchronous interaction nor face to face (since students were not in the same physical space). Blended learning definitions vary (Vaughan 2014), but a consistently used definition is that it is the ''organic integration of thoughtfully selected and complementary face-to-face and online approaches and technologies'' (Garrison and Vaughan 2008, p. 148). The sense of blending face-toface and online modalities is echoed by other researchers (Graham 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operatīva atgriezeniskā saite un formatīvā vērtēšana reālajā laikā palielina skolēnu iesaistīšanos kursa satura apguvē, paver sadarbības iespējas ar vienaudžiem, mā-cībspēkiem un ārējiem ekspertiem, tādējādi palielinot skolēnu panākumus un apmierinātību (Vaughan, 2014). Jauktās mācīšanās efektivitāti var paaugstināt, ja izmanto vērtēšanā centrētu mācību procesu, kurā īsas mācību aktivitātes mācī-šanas menedžmenta sistēmā apvienotas ar e-vērtēšanas rīkiem (Nguyen, 2017).…”
Section: Personalizēta Mācīšanāsunclassified
“…2017, 7, 61 3 of 15 applying academic models [23]. Vaughan [24] warns, however, not to overburden students by using too many forms of assessment to cover too much material. Students can quickly become overwhelmed with content, feel over-assessed, and forget about key concepts.…”
Section: Author Affects Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%