Student Coaching: How Far Can Technology Go?

Abstract

Recent studies show that programs offering structured, one-on-one coaching and tutoring tend to have large effects on the academic outcomes of both high school and college students. These programs are often costly to implement and difficult to scale, however, calling into question whether making them available to large student populations is feasible. In contrast, interventions that rely on technology to maintain low-touch contact with students can be implemented at large scale and minimal cost but with the risk of not being as effective as one-on-one, in-person assistance. In this paper, we test whether the effects of coaching programs can be replicated at scale by using technology to reach a larger population of students. We work with a sample of over four thousand undergraduate students from a large Canadian university, randomly assigning students into one of the following three interventions: (i) a one-time online exercise designed to affirm students' values and goals; (ii) a text messaging campaign that provides students with academic advice, information, and motivation; and (iii) a personal coaching service, in which students are matched with upper-year undergraduate coaches. We find large positive effects from the coaching program, as coached students realize a 0.3 standard deviation increase in average grades and a 0.35 standard deviation increase in GPA. In contrast, we find no effects from either the online exercise or the text messaging campaign on any academic outcome, both in the general student population and across several student subgroups. A comparison of the key features of the text messaging campaign and the coaching service suggests that proactively and regularly initiating conversations with students and working to establish trust are important design features to incorporate in future interventions that use technology to reach large populations of students.

Goal Setting, Academic Reminders, and College Success: A Large-Scale Field Experiment

“…Minimum word counts and time restrictions were imposed to encourage participants to give each answer an appropriate amount of consideration -to encourage students to write freely, we made clear we would delete their written thoughts after emailing their completed exercise for reference. Responses to part of a similar exercise reported in Oreopoulos and Petronijevic (2017) suggest that virtually all students took the task very seriously, writing in personal detail. The entire module was designed to take two hours to complete.…”

Supporting Community College Students from Start to Degree Completion: Long-Term Evidence from a Randomized Trial of CUNY’s ASAP

“…(At CUNY colleges, the caseload is estimated to be higher.) A fairly robust experimental literature on enhanced academic advising interventions finds positive, although often modest, causal effects on students' academic outcomes using a variety of modes of advising (for examples, see Avery, Howell, and Page 2014;Bailey et al 2016; Barr and Castleman 2017;Bettinger and Baker 2014;Sacerdote 2013, 2017;Evans et al 2017;Oreopoulos and Petronijevic 2016;Scrivener and Weiss 2009).…”

How to Improve Teaching Practice? Experimental Comparison of Centralized Training and In-classroom Coaching

“…There is promising evidence that this approach can succeed at shifting teaching practice and improving student learning (Kraft et al 2018), but it is generally considered more expensive (Knight 2012). Recent evidence has also shown that low-cost adaptations to coaching, such as using online technology, is less effective (Oreopoulos & Petronijevic 2018).…”