2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student background determinants of reading achievement in Italy. A quantile regression analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(49 reference statements)
2
21
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the gender disparities in reading were not uniform across the range of reading scores, with larger differences at the extreme tails of the distribution in second grade and in the lower tail of the distribution in fifth grade. Overall, these results confirm that gender gaps vary across the ability distribution, as observed in previous studies exploring gender differences using a quantile regression approach (Penner and Paret 2008;Robinson and Lubiensky 2011;Giambona and Porcu 2015;Contini et al 2016) and in Baye and Monseur (2016) meta-analysis on databases from IEA and PISA international surveys. Findings on the fifth-graders confirm that the male advantage in mathematics is more substantial at the upper tail of the ability distribution (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Also, the gender disparities in reading were not uniform across the range of reading scores, with larger differences at the extreme tails of the distribution in second grade and in the lower tail of the distribution in fifth grade. Overall, these results confirm that gender gaps vary across the ability distribution, as observed in previous studies exploring gender differences using a quantile regression approach (Penner and Paret 2008;Robinson and Lubiensky 2011;Giambona and Porcu 2015;Contini et al 2016) and in Baye and Monseur (2016) meta-analysis on databases from IEA and PISA international surveys. Findings on the fifth-graders confirm that the male advantage in mathematics is more substantial at the upper tail of the ability distribution (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Referring to the literature relative to correlates of reading and math achievements (Baye and Monseur 2016;Gursakal et al 2016;Giambona and Porcu 2015), as well as the information about students' achievement estimates two group of variables have been considered from the INVALSI dataset.…”
Section: Students' Characteristics and Geographical Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations